At the age of 23, who was more impressive against Paulie- Khan or Broner?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Super Hans, Jun 23, 2013.


Page 2 of 4
  1. MAJR

    MAJR Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,534
    407
    Jul 16, 2012
    Did Broner beat Mallignaggi better than Khan did? Yes or no. Because that's what this poll is about. Not who would beat who if you could have the 23 year old versions of Khan and Broner fight each other.

    Though, on that subject, the case can be made that Broner lost to Quintero, Ponce De Leon and Mallignaggi as each fight was close and his opponent had a viable case for having done enough to deserve the win. Given the fact that Khan beat a younger Mallignaggi far easier than Broner did then I wouldn't have any confidence in Broner's ability to "school" him under any circumstance - Broner might just edge it in a hypothetical fight but he's not good enough to school a fighter of Khan's calibre as he proved when he struggled with Quintero, Ponce De Leon and Mallignaggi.
     
    MAJR, Oct 31, 2013
    MAJR, Oct 31, 2013
    #16
  2. TeddyL

    TeddyL Active Member Full Member

    704
    0
    Sep 13, 2013
    No it asks if it was more impressive. Jumping up 2 weight divisions and taking on the welterweight champion is more impressive than anything Khan has yet achieved.
     
    TeddyL, Oct 31, 2013
    TeddyL, Oct 31, 2013
    #17
  3. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Lmao. Broner was better then and now by far...
     
    BlizzyBlizz, Oct 31, 2013
    BlizzyBlizz, Oct 31, 2013
    #18
  4. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:lol::lol::lol:

    This chump think Broner did better against Paulie than Khan :lol:

    Feeling a bit lonely there in the voting?
     
    Super Hans, Oct 31, 2013
    Super Hans, Oct 31, 2013
    #19
  5. TeddyL

    TeddyL Active Member Full Member

    704
    0
    Sep 13, 2013
    I didn't vote.

    Of course he did better. When Khan jumps up to light middle and takes on the world champion and wins then perhaps he'll be on equal footing.
     
    TeddyL, Oct 31, 2013
    TeddyL, Oct 31, 2013
    #20
  6. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    :lol: 'the' welterweight champ

    He won it off Senchenko, who bought the title (yes, bought it), then he retained it by robbery against Pablo Cesar Cano. A man who either side lost to the totally shot duo of Erik Morales and Shane Mosley

    Then Paulie still argubably beat Broner!


    I bet this is one of the friggin idiot *****'s who argued that Pacquiao jumping two weigh classes to DESTROY De La Hoya wasn't impressive because De La Hoya wasn't at his best too.

    Jumping two weigh classes isn't that impressive when your a 10 to 1 favorite, fighting someone with ZERO power, who is clearly past it and your still clearly the bigger man, have to foul by clearly kicking Paulie, then still, STILL get a dodgy points win

    :lol::rofl
     
    Super Hans, Oct 31, 2013
    Super Hans, Oct 31, 2013
    #21
  7. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    Nice try but click on the one next to Broner's name.

    Sorry- no anonymous voting on my threads. The trolls who DKSAB are named and shamed

    Now log off and close your account :hi:
     
    Super Hans, Oct 31, 2013
    Super Hans, Oct 31, 2013
    #22
  8. TeddyL

    TeddyL Active Member Full Member

    704
    0
    Sep 13, 2013
    Fixed

    Whether you cry about Broner or not, the fact is he jumped two weight divisions and beat the welterweight champion. Khan didn't.
     
    TeddyL, Oct 31, 2013
    TeddyL, Oct 31, 2013
    #23
  9. articuno

    articuno Active Member Full Member

    908
    1
    Sep 5, 2013
    Paulie also lost to hatton at 140. Clearly drained.

    Broner paulie had more meaning, cause of jessica, the *****
     
    articuno, Oct 31, 2013
    articuno, Oct 31, 2013
    #24
  10. A|C|S

    A|C|S The original |A|C|S| Full Member

    6,223
    5
    Oct 17, 2013
    Lol you know the answer so why make a thread you bored spastic
     
    A|C|S, Oct 31, 2013
    A|C|S, Oct 31, 2013
    #25
  11. Str8ryte

    Str8ryte Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,943
    95
    Apr 27, 2012
    Why ask a question you already know the answer to? Lmfao. He wanted people to say something nice about shitty ass Khan. An attention grab, from an attention *****.
     
    Str8ryte, Oct 31, 2013
    Str8ryte, Oct 31, 2013
    #26
  12. weegriffin

    weegriffin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,121
    22
    Aug 25, 2009
    Malignaggi has fought almost his whole career at 140 lbs and has went lower than that to fight Diaz how was he clearly drained?

    He got beat by Hatton but Hatton was still number 1 at the weight at the time.
     
    weegriffin, Oct 31, 2013
    weegriffin, Oct 31, 2013
    #27
  13. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    I'm not one to point out the people who DKSAB and trolls, but these people think Broner did better:

    [url]blackbolt396[/url], [url]G Man[/url], [url]mcoleman[/url], [url]TeddyL[/url]


    :patsch:lol::rofl
     
    Super Hans, Oct 31, 2013
    Super Hans, Oct 31, 2013
    #28
  14. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    If Malginaggi was THE welterweight champ, what was Mayweather? Paper titlist?

    I'm sure Khan could go upto Junior Middleweight and beat Sergio Mora easily, if he'd be given a paper title. And not make a pig's ear of it and lose like Broner did.
     
    Super Hans, Oct 31, 2013
    Super Hans, Oct 31, 2013
    #29
  15. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
    What's the point Hans ?
     
    blackbolt396, Oct 31, 2013
    blackbolt396, Oct 31, 2013
    #30
Page 2 of 4