What are you a black ******* with a white mans name, what's skin colour got to do with it, generally white people are better fighters and a lot tougher than black people, but skin colour doesn't make any difference directly, its your genetics that make people tough or strong and usually white people have better genetics partly to do with black people inbreeding in tribes for centuries. also look at Fury and then look at Wilder, Fury is a strong man Wilder is more ripped and if Wilder was the same size as Fury presuming Fury has a higher body fat Wilder would be stronger but as it is Fury is a hell of a lot stronger due to being about 4 stone heavier and a lot bigger, Wilder has no size he is just tall and that is it tall isn't size or strength muscle mass is what makes you strong and by looking at Wilder he has next to no strength for someone of his age and being built like a rake like he is is embarrassing but it is better than being obese though but still Wilder is built like you would expect a teenager to look like. Fury would win by KO in first 4 rounds.
Remember how hard Fury went down from a light-punching cruiserweight in Cunningham? Wilder would knock his block off.
based on what? the guy has knocked out "0" people rated in the top 50. and thats a fact jack. anyone looks like ko artist fighting the absolute sh.it Wilder has.
All right then clever **** every ones allowed their opinion even if yours is wrong but explain to me how skin colour makes a difference to how well you can fight and explain how wilder is stronger than fury if you know so much because you must know if your calling my post misinformed , so enlighten me?
Fury hasn't exactly fought a bunch of good fighters either. Based on he has an Olympic medal and power. His chin probably isn't very good but he'd still KO Fury.
I don't think skin color makes any difference, and I really don't know who is stronger between the two. I do think Wilder is faster and the harder puncher though from what I've seen out of both fighters. Your post is misinformed and purposely biased when you make the moronic claim one race may be genetically superior to another when you throw out statements like "white people have better genetics partly to do with black people inbreeding in tribes for centuries." Can you back this up with any links proving this, or is this just your opinion? And by the way...it's "allowed", not "aloud". atsch
tyson fury has fought light years ahead in competition...are you serious? :rofl you are obviously clueless when it comes to boxing. Wilder hasnt been in the ring with anyone that was a living body, its down right embarrassing at this point. Wilder wouldnt make it past the 4th round with a guy like Fury....Fury is no bum like Wilders first 30 opponents :deal
Do you watch TV like factual or documentary programmes they are not the most entertaining but you should watch some you might learn something.:good
So you got no credible links, is that what you're saying? And yes my boy I've seen plenty of documentaries and done even more reading. I don't buy any of that hoopla anymore than I do that blacks are physically superior because they were bred to be stronger during slavery. If its not scientifically proven you're just throwing out things about race to try and make your hollow point sound more intelligent. In the end though you're anything but if you have nothing more than "Do you watch TV like factual or documentary programmes they are not the most entertaining but you should watch some you might learn something". Clueless child! atsch By the way...it's programs" not "programmes".