Froch would have lost

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by PinoyKid, Nov 24, 2013.


  1. PinoyKid

    PinoyKid Member Full Member

    152
    0
    Nov 23, 2013
    And most of us know it.

    He would have been stopped, he was all over the place throughout the entire fight. But Groves got hurt for a few seconds and it's stopped?

    Travesty.
     
  2. WBCIBFWBAChamp.

    WBCIBFWBAChamp. Active Member Full Member

    1,116
    0
    Apr 4, 2013
    Froch was so slow...
    It's not like George was gassing? He had stuff in reserve and was still hitting back.
    That why i keep objecting the claims that he would of been stopped.

    I mean if groves had took a knee, he could of just retained hes composure and box froch head off like he was doing all fight.
     
  3. Rhodesie9

    Rhodesie9 Active Member Full Member

    1,172
    1
    Mar 28, 2013
    But would he have lost?We don't know and that is the annoying thing about the premature stoppage.
     
  4. Westy78

    Westy78 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,405
    0
    May 24, 2013
    I can sort of live with the stoppage although i do believe it was early. what worries me is the score cards, this business does let its self down at times

    And for me Sky need to get rid of Jim Watt complete idiot
     
  5. Ringmaster

    Ringmaster Member Full Member

    496
    0
    Feb 22, 2013
    No one can say anything for definite.

    Froch was getting himself back in the fight and Groves was clearly getting tired.

    The stoppage was very frustrating because we dont know whether Froch would have got to Groves or whether Groves could have pulled off another punch to stop Froch in his tracks again.