What were they. I heard two judges had froch up. But also heard groves was winning on all three which he should have been 6-2 with a knockdown
yep but i think Groves still controlled all rounds i had it 7-1 but i am easy with 6-2 as it was 50/50 round in there
1 - clear groves 10-8 2 - clearly groves 3 - groves but could be given to froch (not clear 50/50) 4 - clearly groves 5 - froch round 6 - groves round 7 - groves round 8 - groves round 9 - froch buzzes groves first time and its stopped instantly I see 6 rounds clearly for groves - rounds 3 and 5 could be given to froch. I cant see how anyone could give froch any more rounds.
Two of the had Groves up by only one point! I had Groves up by three or four. I have to say Jim Watts commentary was so bias towards Groves. I think Froch would have eventually stopped him. Carl Froch is one tough MoFo, no doubt, a true warrior, the kinda guy you want in the trenches with you. If Groves had been able to stick to a plan he could win easily. Better skills, faster and seemingly stronger.
bias? it was accurate. Groves took froch to school...groves is a class above carl. I guess your related to froch or something? sorry but was groves hurt at any point in that fight? Get the **** outta here idiot
Yeah if you think had the 9th round finished the way it was going it would have been even on two scorecards. :bart
I had it 78-73 Groves. Froch was very lucky to have no points deducted. Groves also could, and probably should of had a point off, but if that was the case - Froch should of had at least 2 points off.
http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/lat...to-carl-froch-before-he-stopped-george-groves 46 from 46 had Groves up