Ritchie Woodhall

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Glenmax777, Nov 25, 2013.


  1. Glenmax777

    Glenmax777 Member Full Member

    329
    0
    Jul 3, 2011
    Woodhall has to be the best analyst on TV these days. Never gets carried away, makes sound arguments and gets his point across in a clear succinct manner. On the other hand I hope David Haye doesn't end up working on more shows, he's awful, he kept getting the names mixed up and at one strange point he actually forgot Groves name! highly strange.
     
  2. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,110
    Sep 21, 2013
    Agreed.

    Knows his stuff and tells it how it is.
     
  3. I Shot JR

    I Shot JR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,651
    1,798
    Feb 17, 2012
    I thought Professor X was quite good on Saturday- Woodhall is decent but he's seemingly on every channel every weekend. Spreads himself too thinly.

    I like Al Bernstein in any capacity- how on earth Channel 5 lure him over is beyond me.
     
  4. ChewingGumHead

    ChewingGumHead Member Full Member

    104
    1
    Feb 23, 2013
    Really like Woodhall myself. Very measured in his views and never biased. I also very rarely find myself disagreeing with Barry Jones.
     
  5. korn96

    korn96 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,624
    1
    Mar 3, 2013
    Woodhall Barry Jones and Tony Bellew all do a good job as talking heads
     
  6. Bub

    Bub Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,807
    7
    Jan 26, 2011
    Like many, he underestimated Groves. Saying he didn't have the power to hurt Froch but yeah he's quite calm and impartial. Pretty good overall. Didn't have a problem with Haye.
     
  7. Ade_Lad

    Ade_Lad Active Member Full Member

    600
    1
    Mar 26, 2013
    Him, Bellew, Barry Jones and Jamie Moore are the best pundits for me. He speaks he most knowledge and the only time I've really disagreed with him is last ringside. Thought he was favoring Froch too much. I guess it's because of his connections with Rob Mckracken.
     
  8. Outboxer

    Outboxer Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    6
    Mar 29, 2005
  9. JonStevo10

    JonStevo10 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,615
    2
    May 28, 2013
    I like his analysis but he is one dull person. Does he ever smile?

    I'd like to see Alex Arthur get more gigs as a pundit.
     
  10. lazarus20000

    lazarus20000 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,247
    4
    Dec 7, 2008
    Top analysis from Woodhall. I found Khan even worse than Haye on the weekend. He really doesn't have anything insightful to say. Top boxer but definitely not a commentator.
     
  11. Big

    Big Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,685
    0
    Sep 12, 2013
    Ritchie woodhall is good, never gets carried away and always delivers in a calm impartial manner. Though a bit boring.

    Personally thought David Haye did well.
     
  12. antonio plaisir

    antonio plaisir the detonator Full Member

    7,061
    3
    Nov 30, 2012
    he's an analyst, and a good 1, not a comedian. sure you ain't just stereotyping his accent?
     
  13. Clint Eastwood

    Clint Eastwood Do You Feel Lucky, Punk?! Full Member

    800
    0
    May 31, 2012
    I normally like Richie, but in the ring on Saturday, didn't he say that Groves couldn't hurt Froch with his right hand?
     
  14. Kaz_187

    Kaz_187 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,945
    1
    Mar 19, 2006
    best analyst out there? is this the same woodhall who said in the ring before the fight there was no way possible that groves could hurt froch :huh, yes alot of fans people predicted that but hes supposed to be a expert and he gt it horribly wrong
     
  15. DON1

    DON1 ICEMAN Full Member

    5,221
    1,200
    Apr 6, 2006
    Agreed, excellent pundit.