Bradley DID beat pacquaio

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by cereal monotony, Nov 26, 2013.


  1. cereal monotony

    cereal monotony Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,259
    38
    Apr 30, 2013
    I watched the bradley-pacquaiao fight a couple of times. the first time was live on ppv. i had bradlley winning it by closing the show much stronger than the winded pacquaio in the last 5 rounds. so, i wasn't surprised when the judges called it for bradley. after all the so-called controversy i watched the fight again just to re-confirm what i thought i had seen... it was close, but bradley did enough to win that fight just due to late rounds activity.

    a lot of the so-called outrage comes from the fact that pacquiao is so popular and well-liked and appeared to be in control in the early rounds. also, the hbo commentary was biased toward pacquiao, so fans watching at home really believed that pacquaio was dominating every round. and lastly, the fact that bradley is black and not a big name fighter made him unsympathetic to the pro-pacquiao crowd.

    boxing judges get a bad rap for the times they screw up...but once in a while they do get it right. to be honest i was waiting for one of the judges to call the pacman-rios fight 114-114 like the mayweather-alvarez mismatch.
     
  2. TKO6

    TKO6 Boxcar for life Full Member

    1,522
    149
    Apr 23, 2013
    What planet are you on, all the viewing public press and boxing world (a few haters aside) called that fight for pac man, I had Pac up by 4 on my card and have watched the fight back a few times now I can't see how you can give Bradley more than 4 rounds and even those could have gone either way. Your rather a hater or a troll my friend
     
  3. Rojo

    Rojo Active Member Full Member

    566
    1
    Sep 9, 2013
    I really like Bradley. I think he's a great (and I mean Great) fighter and he's smart as hell and seems to be a good man. Also, Bradley gets better with time. Lots to like about Bradley. In fact, Bradley is my favorite Boxer and I think he's the best Champion Boxing has had in a very long time - he brings a lot of credibility to a sport that needs it.

    However, Bradley did not beat Pacquiao.

    Go look at the fight again.
     
  4. cereal monotony

    cereal monotony Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,259
    38
    Apr 30, 2013
    the judges are paid to score fight...not vote for a popularity contest. all three judges had the fight very close. a couple of rounds swing both ways. all your jacked up scoring goes to show iis that you don't know how to score a fight or your biased in favor of pacman too.
     
  5. cereal monotony

    cereal monotony Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,259
    38
    Apr 30, 2013
    c'mon dude, pac was winded in the last 5 rounds...bradley was beating his a88 and the commentators were acting like they didn't notice any of bradley's punches. you watch the fight again.
     
  6. TKO6

    TKO6 Boxcar for life Full Member

    1,522
    149
    Apr 23, 2013
    I have no bias towards either fighter, I have much respect for both fighters they are both elite and at the top of there games. The reason it was so close on all the score cards from the so called judges is the fix was in. It's impossible for so many people to get it that wrong I am afraid. You are in a minority of about 1% who think Bradley won that fight the other 99% made up of fans pundits and other boxers what makes you think you know better than them ?

    Now stop trolling please its boring me
     
  7. dbouziane

    dbouziane ............. Full Member

    11,049
    27
    Nov 4, 2007
    Negative amigo. Look at some of the judges cards RBR. No way you can give Bradley some of the rounds he was given. No way some of those rounds "swing both ways." Pretty sure one of those was round 5.
     
  8. cereal monotony

    cereal monotony Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,259
    38
    Apr 30, 2013
    the really weird thing about this fight is, the judges are watching the fight and calling it practically even. one judge had it for pac 7-5. the other two had it for bradley 7-5. clearly it was a very close fight in reality, even if most people were caught up in the pacman group-think hype. and if you thinik about it, bradley beat marquez easy too...so maybe the judges saw bradley-pac fight correctly.
     
  9. cereal monotony

    cereal monotony Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,259
    38
    Apr 30, 2013
    a lotta fans see what they want to see.
     
  10. TKO6

    TKO6 Boxcar for life Full Member

    1,522
    149
    Apr 23, 2013
    Cereal I am no fan boy of Pacquaio, I watched that fight no caring who won I just wanted to see a good fight. The result was a robbery the fight was not close 7 - 5 Bradley on 1 card would have been a disgrace but 2 was a stain on boxing,
     
  11. Overhill

    Overhill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,960
    5
    Jul 28, 2010
    1 Barry Tompkins Showtime 119-110 Pacquiao
    2 Harold Lederman HBO 119-109 Pacquiao
    3 Ray Markarian The Sweet Science 119-109 Pacquiao
    4 Michael Marley Examiner 119-109 Pacquiao
    5 Dan Rafael ESPN 119-109 Pacquiao
    6 Vittorio Tafur San Francisco Chronicle 119-109 Pacquiao
    7 Michael Woods The Sweet Science 119-109 Pacquiao
    8 Ramon Aranda 3 More Rounds 118-110 Pacquiao
    9 Mario Cabrera Boxing Republic 118-110 Pacquiao
    10 Nigel Collins ESPN 118-110 Pacquiao
    11 Mike Coppinger Ring Magazine 118-110 Pacquiao
    12 Ace Freeman Fight Fan 118-110 Pacquiao
    13 Rich Marotta KFI Los Angeles 118-110 Pacquiao
    14 Kelsey McCarson The Sweet Science 118-110 Pacquiao
    15 Gabriel Montoya MaxBoxing 118-110 Pacquiao
    16 Pete O’Brien USA Today 118-110 Pacquiao
    17 Eric Raskin Grantland 118-110 Pacquiao
    18 Michael Rosenthal Ring Magazine 118-110 Pacquiao
    19 Colin Seymour Examiner 118-110 Pacquiao
    20 Ryan Songalia Ring Magazine 118-110 Pacquiao
    21 Gary Andrew Poole TIME 118-110 Pacquiao
    22 Ryan Burton Boxing Scene 117-111 Pacquiao
    23 Scott Christ Bad Left Hook 117-111 Pacquiao
    24 Tim Dahlberg Associated Press 117-111 Pacquiao
    25 Gareth Davies London Daily Telegraph 117-111 Pacquiao
    26 Doug Fischer Ring Magazine 117-111 Pacquiao
    27 David Greisman Boxing Scene 117-111 Pacquiao
    28 Jorge Hernandez The Low Blow 117-111 Pacquiao
    29 Kevin Iole Yahoo! Sports 117-111 Pacquiao
    30 Robert Littal Black Sports Online 117-111 Pacquiao
    31 Steve Kim Max Boxing 117-111 Pacquiao
    32 Ryan Maquiñana Comcast SportsNet Bay Area 117-111 Pacquiao
    33 David Mayo MLive 117-111 Pacquiao
    34 Kieran Mulvaney HBO 117-111 Pacquiao
    35 Lance Pugmire Los Angeles Times 117-111 Pacquiao
    36 Chris Robinson Boxing Scene 117-111 Pacquiao
    37 Nick Xouris Fight Hype 118-111 Pacquiao
    38 Champ Ross Da Truth Boxing 117-111 Pacquiao
    39 Luis Sandoval Boxing Scene 117-111 Pacquiao
    40 Jonathan Sakti Comcast SportsNet Bay Area 117-111 Pacquiao
    41 Tim Starks Queensberry Rules 117-111 Pacquiao
    42 Richie Tomassini Comcast SportsNet Bay Area 117-111 Pacquiao
    43 Darren Velasco 8 Count News 117-111 Pacquiao
    44 Rick Reeno Boxing Scene 116-112 Pacquiao
    45 George Willis New York Post 116-112 Pacquiao
    46 Steve Zemach Queensberry Rules 116-112 Pacquiao
    47 Armando Alvarez Telemundo 115-113 Pacquiao
    48 Jake Donovan Boxing Scene 115-113 Pacquiao
    49 Lem Satterfield Ring Magazine 115-113 Pacquiao
    50 J.C. Casarez Boxeo Mundial 115-113 Pacquiao
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    54 Springs Toledo[22] The Sweet Science 117-112 Pacquiao
    55 Matthew Porter[citation needed] BoxingBets.info 117-110 Pacquiao
    56 Cliff Rold Boxing Scene 117-111 Pacquiao
     
  12. VivaNazVegas

    VivaNazVegas Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,570
    0
    Sep 16, 2011
    cereal monotony is a troll.
    He doesn't really believe that Bradley beat Pacquiao, he's just pretending to think so in order to start arguments.
    Notice how about 98% of the population think Pacquiao beat Bradley, yet on this site it seems to be the complete opposite.
    "What's the deal with that?" you might ask.
    Well, the thing is that this site is being overrun by trolls.
    The trolls in question say things they know aren't true in order to start arguments.
    I know you're all angry that someone would suggest that Bradley beat Pacquiao when he clearly didn't but you're just playing into the hands of the troll by replying to this thread.
    By posting in this thread, you're just encouraging people to keep creating troll threads.
    Don't feed the troll
     
  13. TKO6

    TKO6 Boxcar for life Full Member

    1,522
    149
    Apr 23, 2013
    :deal This
     
  14. moulicules

    moulicules Chessmaster Full Member

    806
    0
    Nov 12, 2010
  15. VivaNazVegas

    VivaNazVegas Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,570
    0
    Sep 16, 2011
    Please refrain from posting in this thread, the TS is a troll that just wants to start arguments and by posting in this thread, you're feeding the troll.
    Don't feed the troll