Not quite, no. As for Rabchenko, for those who don't know him, despite toiling in Euro scene obscurity he is most assuredly world class and might actually be among the h2h ten best at the weight. He is a KO threat for nearly everybody at 154. Baysangurov, eh - I always considered him a bit of a paper champ (like the man who dealt his one pro loss, K9 Bundrage, when K9 held a belt courtesy of Don King's wheeling and dealing) and he was very lucky to get the nod over Soro period - let alone by those ridiculously wide scores. A draw or 114-113 either way made far more sense.
trout is a decent fighter, but throws bascially a jab....and nothing else. He has no plan b if he cant out jab his oppoenet, and now has been shown up in back to back fights (outclassed against lara, and couldnt take advantage against a canelo who wasnt throwing any punches)...minus looking good against cotto, trout has been slightly above average.he looked average against delvin as well who is no world beater...based on andrades length and movement, he would pull a lara, but maybe not as definitively
yeah right man. Rhodes had just got stopped by a 20 year old Canelo Alvarez a year before he fought him. The other guys are nobodies. **** off with this racist ****. This is a big reason why I've been avoiding this site. Naw I don't think he's as good as Trout.
I agree with you tbh. I'll consider moving him below them. I had him there now since he's unbeaten and got a title. Trout is coming off of 2 losses and Cotto is 1-2 in his last 3 fights. Despite all of that though, I still have a higher opinion of them than I do Andrade thanks man :good
1 - Floyd 2 - Lara 3 - Canelo 4 - Kirkland 5 - Trout 6- Cotto 7 - Molina 8 - Andrade 9 - Angulo 10 - Martirosyan
1. Lara 2. Mayweather 3. Canelo 4. Trout 5. Molina 6. Cotto 7. Andrade 8. Martirosyan 9. Kirkland 10. Angulo
I'm not rating Floyd at 154 because he is not a natural junior middleweight and already said he will not be fighting again at this weight: 1. Canelo 2. Lara 3. Cotto 4. Trout 5. Andrade 5. Molina 6. Vanes M. 7. Kirkland 8. Angulo 9. Smith 10. Open to up and comers
This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
my bad.... doesnt make the overall statement any less true though - he wasnt top 10, i dont know the eact rankings at the time, but I'd be surprised if rhodes was up there
Golovkin 1 GGG doesn't need to actually fight guys at 154 to be the best, he just needs to say he's willing to and then fight nobodies to stay busy instead
Rabchenko should be in the top 10 hes the future of the division he'd **** all these boys up its a weak division theres only Alvarez and Rabchenko that are good