What would Shawn Porter have done to Broner last night?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by pmfan, Dec 15, 2013.


  1. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009


    :rofl:patsch:rofl:patsch
     
  2. SUGAR J

    SUGAR J P4P KING Full Member

    2,052
    1
    May 10, 2011

    Kell Brook is a very good fighter, make no mistake. :deal
     
  3. cdvandy

    cdvandy I'm Not Afraid Full Member

    632
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    Screw porter. Toss brook to mayweather and ur hype job gets beat down the same way
     
  4. audio101

    audio101 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,660
    0
    Dec 3, 2005
    Really? You honestly think that's the only reason he lost to him? Paulie has zero power and look at all of the problems he gave him. Nice try.
     
  5. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super Oneā„¢ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    :good
     
  6. cippi

    cippi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,156
    888
    Feb 28, 2009
    it would of been a good fight. broners problem is if he doesnt knock you out the fight is going to be close because he doesnt throw alot of punches. but his punches are powerful. maidana deff felt them punches but he a tuff mofo n he doesnt get knocked out the harder u hit him the harder he fights back.

    i dont even wanna see the rematch right away. i want broner to fight sum other tuff guy. bring on lucas/broner
     
  7. strongarm

    strongarm Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,681
    3
    Dec 5, 2008
    Maidana has horrible defense, so bad that even josesito landed at will. If maidana didnt have that power, how exactly do you supposed he would have beaten broner? With speed and skill? Hell no! Clearly broner was hesitant about letting his hands go... so the power is what did it.

    Paulie has good speed and tremendous skill...

    Honestly, how does maidana beat anyone in the top if he didnt havd power? No way he even competes at the higher level