Pac's 8 titles in 8 divisions is like

Too bad for you delusional *******s run ESPN, Ring, yahoo, CBZ, and every established outlet, including the BWAA which voted Pac Fighter of the Decade

 

Different people count different organizations, titles etc. It doesn't really matter anyway. Pacquiao has beaten many good fighters and has won in many different weight divisions. Pacquiao is one of the most successful boxers ever.

 

Just pitiful. All your moronic questions have been answered over and over. That's why you come off so very stupid.

Yes on no questions, don't tell me you can't handle that:

1. Was Sergio lineal when he fought Chavez?
2. If a lineal champ is stripped of his ABC belt, does the lineal belt go vacant?

 

Ok so by that rational did Floyd win a belt at 140?

Because he fought for the WBC title , yet Gatti wasnt even in the top 5 at that weight and didnt fight against any fighters who didnt hold titles but were way better?

 

i take it that when you dont know you just dont know do you.

its been right through this thread.

 

Ring title used to be legit and count, less so anymore. It's often the same thing as lineal, not always. But both Pac's Ring titles were lineal, so no doubt there. Minor titles like the IBO, WBU don't count of course.

See, that wasn't hard. How about my 2 yes/no questions?

 

Who's to say what counts and what doesn't count?

 

WTF? Lineal titles legit, yes. Ring titles almost always legit, in Pac's case he had both Ring and lineal, so YES. Fringe titles not legit, no. Jeezus, how do you work the PC? I dunno, but work out my 2 questions, ******