For those who think Froch will win...

WTF are you going on about now ?
Do you hear voices in your head, or do you have problems digesting what is written by others ?

 

Your a moron mate
Your saying froch "cracked groves with a right hand" and I'm saying no. You look at the state of the 2 fighters then froch is stumbling like a drunk on shaky legs and groves is fresh.

What don't you get about that

 

Should of saved my typing finger. atsch
I've yet to see you post any constructive breakdown or analysis of any fight you've commented on.
You throw childish insults at anybody that doesn't have the same opinion, then crow on and on about fcukall interesting.
Now try acting like an adult, and explain yourself without resorting to name calling.
I said Froch initiated his changed plan of attack after "cracking" Groves with a right hand just before the 2 minute mark of the first round. In case you don't understand what i meant by "cracked" it means, landed a decent shot on the target.
Froch was pawing with the jab and occasionally throwing heavier right hands, the punch in question had the desired effect, and Froch then started to fight more aggressively, which in turn lead to him walking onto the right hand that dropped him.
So why are you crowing on and on about Froch staggering around like a drunk ? what has that got to do with my explanation of why i think Froch walked onto the punch that dropped him ?

 

I'd save your breath mate, there are 3/4 people on here who just don't wanna know about what ACTUALLY happened, and probably haven't even seen the whole fight... Try explaining that Froch landed a decent uppercut off the ropes on the inside and then bowled forward to follow it up and walked onto a punch that sparked him. They'll just refuse to acknowledge anything landed. Don't you realise...?! Froch got dominated and landed nothing all night - Groves just marks up easily and that's why he had 2 black eyes....from shoulders and elbows and head butts.

Some people are just out to cause arguments....

 

I've not got the time of day to justify myself via huge long paragraphs on a boxing forum. I can't even be ****ed to read your boring ass post.

It's clearly obvious groves dominated the fight yet you froch fanboys are making posts about single shots froch landed such as "the cracking right hand in the second minute" and "the uppercut off the ropes"

Now if I made the same posts you desperate fans are making about the great shots groves landed throughout the first bout I would literally be here all day he landed that many !!!

Your desperate

Paper win

 

Froch isn't going to get better, if anything he will be slower and have a weaker chin, This fight depends on Groves, if Groves can use his ability and not be stupid he wins Froch isn't nearly as skillful as GG. Froch took a horrible beating last time and he will certainly be taking a hell of a lot come May, Groves is fresher, younger, more powerful, quicker, better jab imo Groves is a clear favorite. I also think GG has won the Psychological war, Froch wasn't keen on the rematch and has now signed, Froch was dropped bad last time Groves wasn't in GG mind he feels he was robbed and thinks he is miles ahead of Carl, Carl will have the KD on his mind and this can effect him imo. Groves has also clearly gotten in his head. Don't forget Groves also had a all the **** with Booth last time ect if anything he will be even better mentally and i fully expect him to either win a UD after giving Froch a beatdown or Stop Carl late.

 

I honestly think he stops froch mid rounds this time

 

Just as i thought, more shite and bollox and still no explanation.
If your struggling with the big words let me know, i'll get my 5 year old grandson to help you.

 

Terrible comeback mate
You've been exposed for the froch bumboy you are
Your in a tiny minority with your **** analysis, because only froch fans alike see it that way
All the neutrals scored it a groves schooling

 

Blah blah blah.
I'm not here to win an insult contest, and as for losing an argument to a fcukin halfwit , thats very unlikely, You already do a fantastic job of making yourself look a cnut everytime you type a sentence.
As for a Froch fan, i hold my hands up and admit i like Froch, and i'm well aware of his limitations as a fighter, but he gets the job done. He never had the exposure and media backing that a lot of lesser fighters had, yet still managed to force himself into the limelight.
Go back and check some of my predictions, the only pick i remember getting wrong in the last umpteen years was fancying Matthysse over Garcia.
Don't forget your login details if Froch beats your boy.

 

Froch was complacent last time thinking he merely had to turn up to win. I doubt he makes that mistake again.

I see GG trying to do the same as last time with less affect. Froch wins mid rounds for me.

 

The thing with the fight is that froch is easy to outbox but really, really hard to beat. Groves hit him with a shot that did a serious amount of damage and would have stopped most fighters, froch managed to find a way back in by the 9th ( although groves still dominated in my opinion). Groves is going to have to drop him again to keep froch wary like he was for the first half of the fight. Groves needs to remind carl early that he has the power to hurt him, knowing froch he will have erased that from his memory.

I think groves will box smart, make froch miss and jab his way to a points win.

 

Yawn
I'm fully aware of froch history
We're talking about the groves fight here
The mere fact you're trying to justify frochs non legitimate victory is a joke. You should be ashamed of yourself.

 

More fcukin drivel, go find the post of mine where i've said that the stoppage was legit.

As for being ashamed, you had Groves winning every round.

 

so did 90% of boxing fans
You had froch being successful in the fight you dribbler