No, I made this thread to throw mud in the face of the poster who made the"Who was greater, Floyd or Duran" thread. Was that you? Why do you create such hate threads?
Nobody is forcing you (Freedom) to look at or even respond to my threads. You could just ignore me rather than lie about having me on ignore. :nut
Floyd can get that title if he decides to cease defending it. Exactly the way Vitali got it. Floyd snapped his wrist in half against Hernández and fought on another 6 rounds in agonizing pain. Viatali quit on his stool because he hadn't the versatility or skills to even carry on another 4 rounds.
So you're saying this was just a reaction to another thread you saw? :rofl A Floyd to Duran comparison makes for an interesting discussion, the answer isn't as obvious as comparing Floyd to Vitali. I agree it's ridiculous, everybody knows Floyd has had a far better boxing career than Vitali. The OP hates certain boxers. He made that silly poll because he knew Vitali would lose.
If we look at this logically, Vitali klitscko is better than floyd by the virtue of the fact that he would kill floyd. that being said, he also beat people who would destroy floyd. on that premise, it would be logical to assume that vitali klitscko is superior to floyd. now some people will bring up pound for pound thats assuming that if floyd was a heavyweight he can move the same as he does right now. this is not true. imagine how fast 140 pound vitali would be. its all conceptual. but what we know for fact is that vitali would beat floyd really badly.
First off, why are you talking to me with different alts. Stay under one screen name. Everyone already know you're the same person. Second, I created the thread to teach you a little lesson. Yes, I most certainly knew how the poll would turn out. Just like you knew what the results would be baiting people into calling Floyd a ducker for not going to 160 with a Duran comparison. I don't even like Floyd, I just dislike your agenda driven attacks so I gave you a taste of your own medicine. Obviously it has worked. What baffles me is how you would even know ANYTHING about the thread since you say I'm on ignore? Funny that child happen unless you were lying and just looking for trouble, hmm?
that is clearly conceptual and cannot be proven. The sport has determined that vitali is better by the fact that it recognizes a need for weight classes. everyone knows that vitali would murder floyd and everyone else on floyd's resume and all his future opponents. that is a fact that you cannot contend with and your point about floyd's resume is irrelevant.
Vitali is better because he's in a higher weight class than Floyd? What? Floyd is better because he's fought in divisions with more talent. The 140-147 divisions are loaded with talented fighters, and Floyd has beaten several of them.
you just assume they are more talented because they look fast to you and you automatically assume they would be just as fast if they were heavyweight and are thus better p4p . your entire premise is purely conceptual while im dealing with facts. you are comparing 2 great fighters and one would completely destroy the other and everyone else he has fought and will fight. its like saying short players in basket ball should be judged differently than the tall ones. and have a height division and then start comparing players in different height divisions. then say how the 4 footers are more competitive.