What percentage would you give Pac beating Canelo 154?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by buckdacious, Mar 9, 2014.


  1. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,690
    Sep 8, 2010
    Some would say it's worthy of discussing since he won a title in the weight class (150 lbs).

    I think there's a reason why Pac has only fought once above WW in what should have been an unsanctioned sparring session against a known cheater whose only good talent is being able to eat punches at will (unless said punches come from a "shot to ****" Mosley, in which case he falls).

    But hey. He fought at JMW while still in his career best winning streak and at his peak of earning power. Why did he never face a top 10 JMW, let alone a top 25 JMW?
     
  2. blitzco

    blitzco Englishism Full Member

    344
    0
    Feb 3, 2010
    70% Pac UD or late TKO
     
  3. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    9
    Jul 25, 2008
    Why u rate 70%? Just asking how u would see the fight go. I think pac would try to War be he wouldnt be able to outgun Canelo IMO
     
  4. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    9
    Jul 25, 2008
    :deal:deal
     
  5. Spoorloos

    Spoorloos IfPacKOsTimImgone90days Full Member

    1,428
    3
    Jan 18, 2014
    Prime Pac is quite underrated h2h in general imo.
    I can't envision Canelo touching the Pac of the Cotto(e)-fight, he was blindingly fast and relentless.
     
  6. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    9
    Jul 25, 2008
    Yea he was very fast and still is but he was still there to be hit. would be a war but Pac would ate some serious body punches that i dont think he could handle. Canelo stopped on cuts or something sounds like it could happen
     
  7. Skullrip

    Skullrip Active Member Full Member

    956
    0
    May 16, 2012
    NEW THREAD: what percentage would you give Floyd fighting Tyson at 190?

    size disparity. know your boxing sh|t.
     
  8. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    9
    Jul 25, 2008
    Dude pac won a title at 154 (Supposley) so learn your boxing :hi::hi:
     
  9. ValentinePrince

    ValentinePrince Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,869
    32
    Nov 21, 2013
    The more I think about the more I think Pac has a shot.

    If Manny can savage Margarito at 165 without losing a single round, why couldn't he garner a victory against Canelo at 170ish?
     
  10. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011

    How about the 150 pounds catchweight for the vacant WBC Light Middleweight Title for Alvarez vs Matthew Hatton?

    Alvarez came in overweight 151.8 pounds and while Matthew Hatton was moving up in weight and has never fought above welterweight (147 pounds) :deal
     
  11. speedsterchris

    speedsterchris Active Member Full Member

    560
    0
    Nov 23, 2013
    I would say that he has a 40-50% chance. ESB loves to treat Pac as the under dog like before he fought Hatton, cotto, marg, and odlh. Canelo is huge but I think Pac's speed would bother him.
     
  12. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon.

    36,422
    39,928
    Aug 28, 2012
    3 or 4 years ago Pac was a lot better. I'd have given him an 80% chance, especially after the way he dealt with Cotto, Margarito, and De La Hoya. Now, it might only be 50%
     
  13. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    9
    Jul 25, 2008
    Whats your point?? Thats was a BS title too. Never thought Canelo was a true champ till be beat Trout anyways
     
  14. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    9
    Jul 25, 2008
    Because Margarito was a punching bag, Canelo isnt :good
     
  15. Skullrip

    Skullrip Active Member Full Member

    956
    0
    May 16, 2012

    what happened after fighting margo? pac said that'd be the last. the size disparity is still a big factor. know your sh|t.