who do you think robbed pacquiao in the bradley fight ?

There was no robbery...
I have rewatched the fight numerous times because of the outrage and I just fail to see what you guys are seeing.
I always come up with the same scorecard 115-114 Bradley, 6 rounds to 5 with one even.
Yes, Manny was throwing more but he wasn't landing half of what the biased commentary-team or Boxrec was giving him credit for.

Only thing the whole debate really proves is that people differ to an enormous extend when it comes down to what they are looking for when scoring a fight, the guidelines leave too much room for interpretation and thats where the whole scoring-problem derives from.

"Effective Aggressiveness" and "Ring Generalship" f.e. are constructed terms that can be interpreted in many different ways.

 

This shows there was a robbery, doesn't get much more one sided in expert opinion:

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Manny_Pacquiao_vs._Timothy_Bradley

 

Delusional. Here's a bunch of ringside scores with no commentators in their ear:

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Manny_Pacquiao_vs._Timothy_Bradley

 

Pac won the fight rather easily. The problem that Bradley fans have is that there is video out there and the video does not lie............................on of the judges resigned after the fight, geeeeee.............I wonder why?

 

The bobfather.

Pac's TR contract was running out, and Bob was about to lose his #1 cash cow.
He wanted Bradley to win and take the baton as his new cash cow.

Basically Bob was cashing out on Pac.

 

Not robbed at all. Watched several times. Commentators were cheating for Pacs punches when they were missing. Many rounds PAC was hardly punching. Can't fool the judges. But sure fooled the audience who don't know ****.

 

Not at all. Watch this fight in slow mo. Do you know anything about boxing.????

 

Again with the commentators. Don't be scared, click on that link, you'll see just about every American boxing writer scoring it wide for Pac ringside. Other insiders also, like Danny Garcia and Jeff Mayweather scoring it 10-2, and Bradley's pal Andre Ward saying Bradley should give the belt back to Pac. These guys don't know **** though, right?

 

As a result of all the uproar, anger and controversy of the scoring of the tim bradley vs manny pacquiao fight caused, the WBO, for which version of the welterweight title the June 9th bout contested, has had five judges re-score the fight.

The five officials, from all over the world, sat down and viewed a video of the fight. Not surprisingly, considering the fact that most fans and experts had Pacquiao winning big over the unbeaten Bradley, all 5 WBO judges re-scored the fight for Pac-Man - and they scored it big for Manny..

The first judge had it 115-111, the second had it 116-112, the third 117-111, the fourth 118-110 and the fifth and final judge had it 117-111 for the pacquiao.

That's about as comprehensive as you can get, and the new scores are bound to convince the critics further that either incompetence or something darker was at work on June 9th.

 

Whenever someone asks who was behind an injustice. I find the simplest answer to be.

THE JEWS!!!

 

:deal

 

to bad the mayweathers don't agree with you dumb *****

 

So you think 122 out of 124 US boxing writers don't know ****, neither do JMM, Andre Ward, Danny Garcia, Jeff and Floyd Sr Mayweather. Gotcha