Had Bradley winning...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Hal 9000, Apr 12, 2014.


  1. ArchieBalfour

    ArchieBalfour New Member Full Member

    94
    0
    Mar 25, 2012
    Pacman dominated the 2nd half of the fight and the first half was prettly level.
     
  2. sheedyxx

    sheedyxx Member Full Member

    332
    0
    Jun 14, 2009
    Scored it 116-112 Pacquiao on mute. Close fight for the first 7 or 8 rounds but Bradley faded at the end. Don't see how it can possibly be scored for Bradley
     
  3. platnumpapi

    platnumpapi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,212
    4
    Jun 10, 2005
    it was close in the 1st half of the fight the last half pacman took over. bradely was making him miss but not doing much afterwards. then he got mad tired and thats not in his nature.
     
  4. yingyang

    yingyang Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,783
    0
    Sep 21, 2010
    *****s: Its a DRAW. You dont win rounds by missing punches.

    ****ing *****s.
     
  5. guncho

    guncho next champion! Full Member

    4,962
    513
    Oct 15, 2007
    should have continued to do so, take another 2 years learn how to score fights and then try again u fail:lol:
     
  6. bandido

    bandido The Black Bandit Full Member

    6,638
    2
    Feb 25, 2010
    that was an easy fight to score...116-112
     
  7. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    Manny shadowboxed, caught silly shots and was hailed for effective aggression.

    Tim Bradley could've made things easier for himself, that is for sure... but I thought he landed the clearer shots round after round, don't know how some people had it a shutout for Manny Pacquiao.

    I was sitting, laughing at all the screams whenever Manny Pacquiao would start to bounce around and flapping his arms in the air, specially the last ten seconds of every round. :lol:
     
  8. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,098
    2,732
    Jul 20, 2004
    Pacquiao 116-112.
     
  9. Hal 9000

    Hal 9000 New Member Full Member

    34
    0
    Jun 11, 2012
    Haha lol guess so, it's true that it's only the second fight I tried scoring. Think I may have had an element of bias cause I had money on bradley lel though I still saw what I saw. Ah well I'm probably wrong, laters fellas
     
  10. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,647
    4,106
    Mar 8, 2008
    We all know he didn't.
     
  11. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,647
    4,106
    Mar 8, 2008
    If fighter A is slipping punches the entire round and throws 20 and fighter B throws 60...guess who I am gonna score the round for?
     
  12. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,647
    4,106
    Mar 8, 2008
    That's such a ***** ass bet. I did a straight up, winner take all bet.
     
  13. Holy Grail

    Holy Grail Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,055
    52
    Sep 13, 2013
    It's some ***** alt account who is scared to post these type of bull**** thread under his real account.

    HAL, did you log back into your ***** account? :lol:
     
  14. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,097
    Jul 24, 2004
    Have'nt seen the fight, but if the ESPN highlights I just watched of Pacquiao missing every combination he's throwing are any indication of how the fight unfolded, it pretty much was a repeat of the first fight where niether fighter landed much of anything.

    I'll watch and score the fight later this week.
     
  15. Holy Grail

    Holy Grail Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,055
    52
    Sep 13, 2013
    No one cares about your biased scoring. You spent over a week constantly bitching and crying that JMM beat Bradley :patsch