It's a catch 22 with the Klitschkos.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ValentinePrince, Apr 25, 2014.


  1. Mr "T"

    Mr "T" Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,278
    33
    Mar 17, 2007
    George was 6' 3 215 lbs. and also dumb
     
  2. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
    It's not only about the competition. It's about how he does it. Wlad fights as a boring, and limited, robot.
     
  3. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,242
    29,304
    Apr 4, 2005
    Steward didn't make Wlad a complete heavyweight but he did make him very hard to beat. Wlad lacks an uppercut and any inside skills. But the skills he does have are A level.
     
  4. BretN

    BretN Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,088
    1
    Feb 23, 2012
    Who the hell ever thought Haye was the heavyweight saviour?
     
  5. eagleskins

    eagleskins Active Member Full Member

    1,478
    0
    Oct 5, 2010
    Guy hit the nail on the head. It is because they are white. The HW division is the glamour division. A white man dominating other divisions doesn't mean much in the grand scheme of things. But a white HW champion really hurts the psyche of racists and wannabes. Those that reply with Tyson really crack me up. A guy that was destroyed at any point in his career by multiple bums.
     
  6. ghostlybadge

    ghostlybadge Punch Drunk Full Member

    1,984
    80
    Dec 9, 2007
    you can say the kits are **** until the cows come home but in the end they are beating everyone they step in the ring with.
    first 4 rounds last night were jab jab jab jab jab jab but when he got hit in the fifth you could see a change and actually went to win.
    If only wlad had more kill and went out from the start to finish it but he has to constantly worry about burning out if he can not get them out of the ring.
     
  7. ghostlybadge

    ghostlybadge Punch Drunk Full Member

    1,984
    80
    Dec 9, 2007
    Who needs an inside game when you are so dominant on the outside.
    Wlad is so easy to beat get on the inside rough him up and land a nice right on his jaw and take the belts but if it is that easy how is nobody doing it.
     
  8. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,242
    29,304
    Apr 4, 2005
    Hard to beat him on the inside when he clinches so frequently to prevent any possible inside work and that's if you can even get on the inside.

    No denying Wlad hasn't needed to learn to fight on the inside due to a combination of poor opposition and his clinching. But I stand by my original post he isn't a complete fighter, but then very few are, even among the greats.
     
  9. robo

    robo Active Member Full Member

    569
    232
    Oct 3, 2012
    As a fighter you need to fight to your strengths and nullify your weaknesses. This is what wlad does.
    Is it exciting to watch? No
    Is it effective ? Yes
    Wlad is as good a fighter as he can be with the attributes he has and 10 years unbeaten deserves some respect.
     
  10. Bald_Toad

    Bald_Toad Ring Title Full Member

    5,200
    5
    Aug 4, 2011
    wlad stop using your size so these guys can tee off on you, then you will be the g.o.a.t.
     
  11. superman1692

    superman1692 Active Member Full Member

    1,177
    41
    Feb 13, 2011
    How the **** is he a complete heavyweight??? All Steward taught him to do was box very conservatively and hide behind a jab, cos otherwise he'll get knocked the **** out.
     
  12. superman1692

    superman1692 Active Member Full Member

    1,177
    41
    Feb 13, 2011
    You really are pathetic. Go wank to pictures of Adolf Hitler.
     
  13. Enigmadanks

    Enigmadanks Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,744
    975
    Feb 5, 2009
    The brothers, to no fault of their own, are just fighting in the most diluted version of the HW division in probably the history of the sport.

    Now they're in a very weird situation because they can only fight the guys in their division. They don't have the luxury that smaller fighters have where guys like Manny or FLoyd can jump up in weight classes and challenge themselves against other top-tier fighters. They're naturally large men and it's not like they can cut down in weight to fight at CW or LHW.

    But there's absolutely no one on Wladimir's resume that would be considered a great fighter. His best win (biggest name)was probably against Sam Peter, a good HW but nothing overly special. He's in the middle of a great 8 year dominating run, but he just doesn't have any marquee wins over anyone of note.

    They don't have any HOF fighters on their resume except for Vitali's loss to Lennox Lewis. Once again, it's no fault of their own, they've both fought pretty much everyone in the top 10 of their division. They're just unfortunately fighting in a period where their only competition is against average HW's at best.

    They're both very good fighters and are on their way to becoming 1st ballot HOF'ers, but boxing pundits and historians aren't going to look too favorably on either of them when comparing them with the great HW champs of the past since neither Klit has any victories over other great fighters. VItali had his chance against a well past his prime Lennox, but that cut he suffered ended any chances to finally get at least one victory on his resume against a HOF HW.
     
  14. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
    P4P#3 baby.

    [url]http://www.boxnews.com.ua/photos/1185/Wladimir-Klitschko-Brewster95.jpg[/url]
     
  15. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,018
    4,516
    Mar 8, 2008
    Even though this era of HW is very weak, I still give Wlad a lot of credit. His loss to Sanders could have destroyed him mentally, but it didn't.

    To give him NO credit is simply unfair.

    To call him an ATG/best ever like some morons here do, is a slap in the face to the true ATG's.