Gotta love the CULT of *******s who use to cry that "why did floyd demand extra testing from Pac and no one else?" and how "Pac never failed a drug test!" You damn fools should not say a damn word! If you were a true fan of Pacs and the sport you would have been yelling at your computer monitors for Pac to roll up his damn sleeve . . . Now it looks bad on him and for him to demand anybody to take test. As for JMM, as the cult use to say, he took all the testing that the commission required and has never been caught. I say implement stringent drug testing for all major fights
You should've seen Marquez last night against Alva. That marfaka fought like he's only 21 never gets tired quick as fùck (though mike is super slow) for 11 rounds (he got tired a little in the 12th or maybe jusy resting). I'd eat sh|t if JMM is clean.
yeah im sure heredia will get caught by 2 month usada testing, but will pass year round testing in the olympics.
Everyone is innocent until proven but guilty. Jmm seems much sketchier that manny IMO. The changes are pretty significant. Especially given his age.
I'm not going to speculate on Marquez's guilt or innocence of him taking PEDs. Although Nothing would shock me with todays athletes, unless you get caught, we will never now for sure. I'm in my 30s and I have no face acne, but I do have some acne on my chest and back and I have no reason to use any PEDs or have I ever used PEDs. By some of you guys' logic I'm juicing. To funny.
See I have ***** tits, acne and an extended belly. I'm close to 40 and I've never taken any either. Everybody lighten the **** up.
Do you think Floyd made the right move demanding tests? I have to admit I was dubious about Pacquiao when he beat Cotto; albeit without proof. I just wondered how he took his power up through the divisions. I seriously doubt Floyd could beat that Pacquiao or the one who destroyed Hatton, so I can see why he would want Manny to prove he was clean.
Pacquiao's fault was beating some of the same opponents in more devastating fashion. Floyd did face a better version of these guys and that made Pac look better than he is, but people were telling Mayweather that Pac did it better so the Mayweathers came up with this deplorable explanation. In order for the lie to serve it's purpose, it must be marginally believable and that's about all it is. What evidence? Other than the flimsy explanation that he is so good he must be on something :roll:, people often point to Pac walking from negotiations. If I accuse you of being a homo***ual and tell you to take a test proving you're not a homo***ual then you are naturally going to tell me to go F myself. That would mean you really are a homo***ual then right? Yes it would according to this logic. Now if Pac performs well he's on the juice and if he doesn't then he must be off of it. And that's how it happened because I've been paying attention. Repeat repeat, until the lie becomes the truth.
Too bad we're not talking about some type of homo***ual **** that you pacturds are always on about. We're talking about a blood test. For a record breaking fight. In Pacquiaos prime. 50/50. He walked
If someone told me to take a homo test to prove I'm not gay so I can bang beautiful women I'm an exclusive club, I'll do it quick.. You act like they aren't getting millions to fight in a sport and he just asked for the hell of it...