FRoch is the marciano of this era

Styles, no, not really at all.

Resume and accolade? Also no, not at all. Marciano is a clear cut above Froch...

 

No it would be Lucas M. But he lost three fights. Rocky never lost

 

I know what he's getting at, though; Froch FIGHTS. He doesn't **** around in there like some boxers, he's a throwback. Sometimes he looks godawful , but he's bloody effective. I have far more time for Froch who at least fights people in their prime, unlike Calzaghe who fought them in senility and bragged about it afterwards!

 

Oddly enough, that is the complaint regarding Marciano.

I don't know who else there really is to fight at SMW, to be honest, that would increase Froch's stock. Ward, obviously. After that, who is left?

 

Hahahahahahaha thanks for the laughs hahahahaha good joke

Comparing marciano to froch is like comparing john lennon to ****** beiber

 

but Froch is an actual proven great fighter...

what wins did Marciano have outside of the blown up LHW's that didn't have any good wins at Heavyweight?

 

did I ever once mention the British bum in my entire post? all right then

 

Nah.....Froch is not. Don't compare him with the Great Marciano, OK?

 

He can be compared with Calzaghe not Marciano for the greatness.

 

Considering Marciano weighed 180 some nights

And froch probably comes in around that

A good argument could be made that froch would beat Marciano anyway

 

You'd better watch tennis dude! :rofl

 

Rocky's rolling in his grave right now at this comparison.

You tards never cease to amaze.

 

And you people call yourself boxing fans?

 

These clowns on this website are mostly uneducated hood rats. They know nothing of the history of boxing and obviously know nothing about the incredible, undefeated all time great Rocky Marciano. Ignore these trolls. They are obviously insecure and probably live in their grandma's basement.