Pacquiao, Marquez, and drug testing...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by alexthegreatmc, Jun 1, 2014.


  1. Skullrip

    Skullrip Active Member Full Member

    956
    0
    May 16, 2012
    unlimited urine testing
     
  2. texboxing00

    texboxing00 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,152
    18
    Jul 16, 2010
    Whats your point? -refusing blood is refusing osdt. Floyd was going to do exactly as pac so no advantage was going to go either way
     
  3. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    There's Pacquiao fans and *******s. Pacquiao fans can be reasonable. *******s are the mindless "everybody is scared of Pacquiao" hate-spewing people who don't make sense in their comments.
     
  4. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    It's well documented that he did.
     
  5. TheCrazyCal

    TheCrazyCal Baby Faced Hassassin Full Member

    575
    1
    Apr 14, 2013
    Innocent until proven guilty regarding athletes is naive.
     
  6. DeadLikeMe

    DeadLikeMe Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,781
    94
    Mar 13, 2012
    They're pinoy, manny is a god and they're 100% blinded from reason or being rational when it comes to him.
     
  7. dsr

    dsr Active Member Full Member

    962
    0
    Jul 10, 2011
    well why isn't the fight being made now?

    people are asking for it and only Floyd is making excuses after excuses

    wasn't the drug test an issue of when the test was supposed to be made? Pacquiao agreed that after the fight he can take as many needles required just not a number of days before correct?
     
  8. FloatingGhost

    FloatingGhost Some guy Full Member

    2,051
    459
    May 16, 2012
    Check my posts ***. Not a psycho PAC fan. Just pointing out that this a floyd loving orgy thread thinly veiled as an unbiased question thread. You are obviously a floyd **** rider. Like everyone else here pretty much. Dredging up 2009 to justify the cowardly acts of the present day.
     
  9. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    You're right. But Pacquiao agreed AFTER negotiations failed. I don't think Mayweather was genuinely suspicious of PED use or scared, I think he was gunning for that psychological advantage. But since Pacquiao initially refused, that's when the suspicions started IMO. Remember Zab Judah wanted Mosely to take a test, Mosely refused, then later came out and said he was on PEDs.

    But I think Mayweather wanted the fight in 2010 and more in 2012. NOW, Mayweather doesn't want it, I think he just doesn't care. If he accepts 60/40 like Team Pacquiao wants, he'll make less than what he did in the Canelo fight. IF they do fight, Mayweather will make sure he makes more than he did in the Canelo fight and that Pacquiao doesn't make close to $40 million.
     
  10. dsr

    dsr Active Member Full Member

    962
    0
    Jul 10, 2011
    what tests did he refused? ALL of them? before and after the fight? are there sources on this?
     
  11. texboxing00

    texboxing00 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,152
    18
    Jul 16, 2010
    And you continue to prove my point.
     
  12. texboxing00

    texboxing00 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,152
    18
    Jul 16, 2010
    He refused 14 day cut off

    Then he agreed to it after first round of negotiations failed, floyd said no cut off now and pac rejected again.

    Its no secret man, if it was not for the test issue then why didn't they fight?
     
  13. Code Red

    Code Red Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,972
    89
    Aug 20, 2013
    Post the Pacquiao Brian Kenny interview, that is Pacquiao clearly ducking OSDT and Mayweather
     
  14. FloatingGhost

    FloatingGhost Some guy Full Member

    2,051
    459
    May 16, 2012
    You made no point *****. U just called me a *******. A word I despise as much as the word ***** cuz these are words flung around by fanboy cheerleaders like you. No comment was made to you personally to have u jumping in n calling names. Must be that I hurt your fanboy feelings. The word hypocrit is thrown around on this thread a lot. I think the main show of hypocrisy surrounding this issue is how you all wanted PAC crucified for unfounded suspicion and you try like hell to give marquez a pass. Any fighter who refuses testing at this point is suspect. That means PAC jmm anyone. To the op...it is not 2009. PAC refused an unprecedented request. I haven't heard of marquez refusing testing anyway but if he or anyone else did including PAC it would be much different than PAC refusing in first negotiations as it's pretty much standard in big fights now.
     
  15. texboxing00

    texboxing00 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,152
    18
    Jul 16, 2010
    You hurt my feelings ? Lol look whos writing paragraphs full of insults. You still continue to prove my point.

    any boxer that EVER denied testing is suspect. Point of thread is why are *******s crucifying jmm when pac was just a suspicious as jmm is.

    Look up my post history

    I dont doubt jmm is on roids (as much as pac was on them). My point is that pac is as guilty as jmm. Both have yet to be proven guilty, but *******s act like jmm tested positive. Jmm has never straight up denied osdt, maybe had a dispute over testing agencies but never denied them. Yet pac straighr up denies it for the biggest pay day ever and *******s are all over jmm.

    Stick to the topic.