Catchweight title fights - right or wrong

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by chap69, Jun 7, 2014.


  1. chap69

    chap69 Banned Twice - Innocent Full Member

    24
    0
    Oct 31, 2011
    Whilst i can accept the concept of catchweight fights what really annoys me is catchweight title fights, we all know the promoter pulls the strings with contracts etc but when it comes to an actual title on the line then the governing bodies need to say a strict no to any contract clause that says either fighter can only weigh a certain amount i.e below the weight category limit, so do you think it's right, wrong or not an issue
     
  2. Sug3

    Sug3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,661
    17
    Nov 10, 2006
    Catchweight World Championships are bs and disrespectful to the Greats of the past....Imagine if the Legends of the past used Catchweights?
     
  3. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    catweights are unacceptable, this is just a poor tactic used to get an advantage over an opponent from a lower/higher weight class, and as Sug3 said, it's disrespectful to the legends of boxing
     
  4. pugs

    pugs Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,220
    3
    Dec 31, 2013
  5. yingyang

    yingyang Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,783
    0
    Sep 21, 2010
    For Floyd.
    *****s: its right.

    For manny.
    *****s: its wrong.
     
  6. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,488
    9,491
    Aug 1, 2012
    It's simple. If two fighters from different weight classes agree to fight, a catchweight can be used. When two fighters hold belts in the same weight class, it is not appropriate. SRL v Lalonde = right, FMJ v Canelo = wrong.

    Cotto vs Martinez? Makes some sense considering Cotto is moving up to a new weight class. 159 sounds like a fair compromise considering Cotto is fighting a naturally bigger man. In general, catchweights are hard to do, which is why there are weight classes.
     
  7. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,222
    3,594
    Feb 20, 2008
    they are a joke and cheapen the sport. End of discussion.
     
  8. *TMT*

    *TMT* Member Full Member

    112
    0
    Jun 5, 2014
    Pac swears by them
     
  9. pugs

    pugs Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,220
    3
    Dec 31, 2013
    Oh a new Mayweather Fanboy ALT?

    So what do you say when Mayweather does catchweights?
     
  10. *TMT*

    *TMT* Member Full Member

    112
    0
    Jun 5, 2014
    I don't agree with catchweight title fights, Pac and roach drain fighter as much as possible to win a belt
     
  11. progamer

    progamer Boxing Junkie banned

    10,232
    0
    Nov 25, 2013
    theftjr not only drained drainelo, i heard he also drained dela hoya's coffers. lmfao.
     
  12. Clarkson

    Clarkson Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,703
    0
    May 7, 2009
    Catchweights are fine to 'even it up' between a big and small fighter but the middleweight title should be fought with a limit of 160lbs. If you're unwilling to fight a guy who may weigh in at 160lbs then you shouldn't fight for the title, just call it a non-title fight.

    This isn't just about Cotto but Mayweather, Pac, SRL etc.
     
  13. pugs

    pugs Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,220
    3
    Dec 31, 2013
    And Mayweather doesn't "drain" opponents when he demands catchweights and even rehydration clauses?
     
  14. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    how about Floyd dragging Marquez up 2 divisions, then still not making the agreed CW? he and his people are just as bad as Pac's when it comes to giving their fighterevery possible advantage
     
  15. MannySteward

    MannySteward Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,660
    4
    May 1, 2011
    Unless it gets two fighters in the ring where it was otherwise hugely unlikely, i don't agree with them.