Before You Replay: Your Scorecards Here

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Lampley, Apr 19, 2008.


  1. Fallow

    Fallow Active Member Full Member

    892
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    Easy night's work for JC:

    This content is protected
     
  2. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Newbie :rofl

    116-112 Calzagne
     
  3. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    169
    Jul 23, 2004
    And like others, I could easily jumped on the bandwagon and say Hopkins won the fight, but he never. I'm not biased. Amsterdam, you are. Not because you had Calzaghe winning, but how you had him winning.
     
  4. Faetter_BR

    Faetter_BR Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,778
    0
    Aug 4, 2004
    116-111 Calzaghe (rounds 1, 2 and 10 for Hopkins)

    Victory by way of "workrate"

    That said Hopkins looked impressive considering his age - but as versus Taylor, he simply works too little...
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,861
    45,618
    Mar 21, 2007
    I had Joe up by ONE POINT.

    Seriously, you're making a pap of yourself. One day off. Chillout.
     
  6. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Not a joke, you picked Bernard to begin with, 9-3 is also a fair score, you can't possibly give Hopkins more than 3 rounds here.
     
  7. jlrivera81

    jlrivera81 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,798
    1
    Jun 11, 2007
    i had it 117-112 Calzaghe
     
  8. Cruiser1

    Cruiser1 Champion Emeritus Full Member

    4,622
    2
    Feb 23, 2005
    115-112 Calzaghe

    There seems to be this phenomenon where a knockdown can really effect people's scoring of an entire fight. Calzaghe got knocked down in the first round and apparently there was a carryover effect into the other rounds, which I find to be amazing. Instead of isolating that one round, people let the knockdown blend into the rest of their scoring when Calzaghe clearly made up for the early deficit.
     
  9. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    I'm making a pap of myself? All of the proven good scorer's here scored it wide for Calzaghe, that was in no way close.
     
  10. Napoleon

    Napoleon Smokin' Full Member

    2,411
    44
    Sep 4, 2006
    Calzaghe winning 115 - 113

    RD1: 10 – 8 Hopkins
    RD2: 9 – 10 Calzaghe
    RD3: 10 – 9 Hopkins
    RD4: 10 – 9 Hopkins
    RD5: 9 – 10 Calzaghe
    RD6: 9 – 10 Calzaghe
    RD7: 9 – 10 Calzaghe
    RD8: 9 – 10 Calzaghe
    RD9: 9 – 10 Calzaghe
    RD10: 10-9 Hopkins
    RD11: 9 – 10 Calzaghe
    RD12: 10 – 10 Draw
     
  11. Lampley

    Lampley Boxing Junkie banned

    7,508
    2
    Oct 30, 2005
    How did you have it, McGrain?
     
  12. Osiris

    Osiris Member Full Member

    120
    0
    Apr 14, 2008
    Same.
     
  13. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    169
    Jul 23, 2004
    I picked Hopkins, but he lost by 3-4 points. He won more than 2 rounds. Bottom line is, both were poor. And for you having Calzaghe winning so wide, that makes his performance look even worse. You can't always win good, sometimes ugly.


    Calzaghe won, no question.
     
  14. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,368
    15,336
    Jul 19, 2004
    I had it 6-6.

    With the knockdown, 1 point for Hops. My card was probably biased. I knew Calzaghe deserved it. He performed brilliantly.