Ranking your top 10 welterweights.

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Pez, Jun 26, 2014.


  1. Pez

    Pez Active Member Full Member

    1,342
    98
    Aug 18, 2013
    Ok, so I've seen a lot of Brook and Khan debate recently, but I'm interested to see how everyone thinks they rank in comparison the the other welterweights in the world and how many people would rank Brook above Khan or Khan above Brook. My top 10 would look something like this:

    1. Floyd Mayweather 46(26)-0-0
    2. Manny Pacquiao 56( 38 )-5(3)-2
    3. Timothy Bradley 31(12)-1-0
    4. Juan Manuel Marquez 56(40)-7-1
    5. Shawn Porter 24(15)-0-1
    6. Keith Thurman 23(21)-0-0
    7. Marcos Maidana 35(31)-4-0
    8. Kell Brook 32(22)-0-0
    9. Amir Khan 29(19)-3(2)-0
    10. Devon Alexander 26(14)-2-0

    I thought the top 4 kind of picked themselves. I rate Thurman highly but as Porter is IBF champ and has beat Malignaggi he edges ahead. Maidana beat Broner but he wasn't exactly a natural welterweight and although he put in a good performance against Floyd I wouldn't have him higher than 7. Brook can't really go any higher until he beats a top opponent while Khan has one fight at welter so hard to put him higher. Devon is a decent welter but lost pretty comfortably to Porter. Agree? Disagree? Interested to see other peoples top 10 :good
     
  2. Suarez7

    Suarez7 Member Full Member

    188
    0
    Dec 30, 2012
    Mayweather
    Pacquiao
    Bradley
    Maidana
    Marquez
    Porter
    Thurman
    Devon
    Khan
    Guerrero
     
  3. second to none

    second to none Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,438
    8
    Jul 1, 2013
    1 Floyd Mayweather
    2 Manny Pacquiao
    3 Timothy Bradley
    4 JMM
    5 Marcos Maidana
    6 Keith Thurman
    7 Shawn Porter
    8 Robert Gurrero
    9 Devon Alexander
    10 Amir Khan
    11 Paulie Malignaggi
    12 Luis Abregu
    13 Kell Brook
    14 Leonard Bundu
    15 Luis Collazo
     
  4. ChipChair

    ChipChair Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,231
    0
    Dec 7, 2012
    I'd probably go with this although that's me ranking on a mixture of skill and what they have achieved, it we are talking purely skill then I make a few changes like moving Thurman up above Maidana.
     
  5. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    5
    Nov 7, 2009
    Neither Brook or Khan should be in anyone's top 10 until they actually beat a top 10 fighter at the weight.
     
  6. second to none

    second to none Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,438
    8
    Jul 1, 2013
    I was basing it on both Maidana has done more especially the last year, Broner may have been a hype job but he did really well against Mayweather when everyone including me was expecting a shutout. I actually rate Thurman as a better fighter then everyone on the list bar Mayweather and Pacquiao but he has to go prove it.
     
  7. Pez

    Pez Active Member Full Member

    1,342
    98
    Aug 18, 2013
    Fair point but what top 10 fighter has Thurman beat?
     
  8. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
    1. Mayweather Jr
    2. Pacquiao
    3. Bradley
    4. Porter
    5. Marquez
    6. Alexander
    7. Maidana
    8. Thurman
    9. Khan
    10. Brook
     
  9. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,590
    Apr 13, 2014
    1. Mayweather
    2. Paquaio
    3. Bradley
    4. Porter
    5. JMM
    6. Maidana
    7. Thurman
    8. Alexander
    9. Brook
    10. Guerrero.
     
  10. Furey

    Furey EST & REG 2009 Full Member

    16,680
    6,790
    Oct 18, 2009
    Khan's not spent to much time up at 147, but what he has done already tops what Brook has done.

    Collazo is a solid WW, coming off the back of a decent win himself. Khan was superb on the night. Also the added fact that he does hold a win over another 'big' name in the division, which while I know the fight wasn't at 147, it was only at 1 division below so that win still holds some decent value as well.

    Brook needs to take his career by the scruff of the neck now and start delivering, which I hope he does.
     
  11. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,590
    Apr 13, 2014
    Collazo was awful. He fought like he'd just been dragged from the pub, as I've said previously Chris Leben from the UFC has better boxing skills than what Collazo showed that night.

    Plus Luis was about 4 years past his sell by date.

    Yes Khan did well but it was nothing special.
     
  12. second to none

    second to none Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,438
    8
    Jul 1, 2013
    Collazo was a good win, sure you can point to him not fighting well but he is a solid WW, coming off a big win against Ortiz and many including me thought he would give Khan serious problems, just because Khan boxed very well and dealt with him easily doesn't mean it's not a solid win.
     
  13. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,590
    Apr 13, 2014
    It was a good win over a solid veteran. But let's be real Collazo wasn't top 10 and although he beat Ortiz let's be real Ortiz was GBP hype right from the start who whilst talented has always found a way to lose.

    Khans team picked a veteran in Collazo who whilst a name was far from his best. Now hopefully he will try to fight a Thurman, Porter, Maidana (rematch) prior to claiming he's owed a Mayweather fight.
     
  14. second to none

    second to none Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,438
    8
    Jul 1, 2013
    He will go nowhere near Thurman or Porter i guarentee that, i reckon if it's not Floyd, Gurrero might be his next fight or Alexander.
     
  15. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,590
    Apr 13, 2014
    They would be good fights to gauge how Khan truly fairs at 147.

    I'd like too see him in with Guerrero, I think it's a true 50/50 fight.