Out of respect for what they've done I've got to go with Bradley on a close decision. But Porter can fight on the inside and seems like the harder puncher who is also entering or in his prime. I can't say that about Bradley at WW anymore. I think styles favor Porter but skills (and proven ones) favor Bradley. Either way, it's pretty close to a 50/50 sort of fight.
Would be a very good fight. Bradley's not looked too clever recently against Provodnikov and Pacquaio maybe he's slipping? If not then he should be a little too versatile for Porter at this stage but I wouldn't write Porter off, he's a strong young bull.
Bradley would 120-108 Porter before he started on the juice. But so would Alexander and Malignaggi so who knows :conf
Bradley cracked mentally against Provo & during the Pac 2 fight... Porter has more power Both can achieve a high workrate...Porter's get dazed by powerfull shots...Bradley hasn't really got that to give...whilst Bradley has an iron chin so it sort of equalises... The better man on the night would win...I feel 9 times out of 10 that would be Bradley....just does what he needs to do to win no matter how ugly...
Watch Porter Diaz I then Porter Diaz II & Alexander quite the difference...he has always been talented...maybe it just took that draw to Diaz for him to get his training together & make sure he is ready to give 100 every fight. Also I think Diaz had him hurt a couple of times in the first fight...so meh... Anyone who works with Conte, Ariza or ESPECIALLY Heredia should be suspicious...but then again you have guys like PEDerson who go out ontheir own and do it...all should be suspicious...this is why as boxing fans we should all be thankfull that all boxers take numerous tests *sarcasm*