Would be the same result again really. You take away Joshua one big weapon which Whyte also has in spades and Anthony gets crushed. Big Dillian is far more suited to the pro game too. Juoshua against the 50 year old Skelton looked there for the taking as well. I reckon even a 40 year old version of Skelton would have won that fight nevermind a beast like Whyte who is Anthony's Daddy.
This, the rematch is the sort of fight Joshua should be aiming for now. Beating down 50 year olds won't cut it anymore.
Hearn would never take that fight. Whyte is probably the most capable HW in the UK. The defensive ability he's shown in so little fights is impressive, his jab is excellent too.
Don't know if it's the camera angle but that's the smallest ring I've ever seen. While it's always good to see a fighters early amateur fights it really means little in the long run. Both were novices and both have come along way since then. Whyte's been banned though so whatever he achieves during his career will have a big question mark over it.
More nonsense from you. Skelton is a step up from his last fight, albeit a small step, but a bigger name and slightly more pressure because of it. Can you provide proof that AJ has or is taking PED's?
I hate when people just throw out these stupid accusations. I'm not actually TOO impressed by AJ. He flails a little bit and doesn't have the defence. He's like a bad version of Tyson Fury. His power can pretty much KO anyone, but he has a lot of technical downsides that make him very susceptible to legitimate HWs, which there are so few of.
Yeah, no ****. Once they test positive, okay, then there's evidence. Until then, it's just speculation. Innocent until PROVEN guilty.