That's what you call "the truth"? 3 more years. That's 10 to 12 fights, your "will still be the same" comment holds no credibility. :good
To have such a weak resume GGG only fights 2 maybe 3 times per year. Plus the caliber of opposition; Adama, Macklin, Stevens, Geale, definititely won't catch or exceed Ward. :yep Yes, that's Truth.
So headbutting and holding your opponent to death is a good win? So super middleweight was stacked during the super six but when calzaghe was kicking the **** out of the same guys the division was weak? Thing I don't understand is ward beats a few of calzaghes left overs and becomes the p4p number 2, joe dominates the same division for over ten years then goes up to light heavyweight and beat Hopkins and jones jr becoming the ring champion and lineal champion and I'm not even sure if he ever got to p4p number 2, doesn't make sense Highest he ever got to was 3 on the p4p list, this is why p4p lists are bias bull****
When did I ever claim that 168 lbs was weak when Calazaghe was champ? There wasn't much to split Marquez and Pacquiao and thus they where rated 1 - 2 P4P, which is a opinion list anyway. Wards resume isn't the greatest I was only claiming it was better than GGG's which unless you disagree what was the point of this post?
wasnt arguing all that with your point in general, its just an example of how the p4p lists are bull**** and when people on here quote them as actually meaning something its idiotic so just because marquez is pacmans boogie man and hasnt done much else he became p4p number 2? kind of idiotic when the guy in third place has dominanted his division for ten years then moved up a division and became lineal champion can you tell me how mike tyson was also rated p4p number one when he dominated a division thats classed as weak today for a year, yet wlad can dominant the division for ten years and is barely top 5 on most peoples lists
I forecasted a possible win by TKO by Lara and if it went to decision Lara would be robbed. That's a 50% correct forecast any way you look at it. :yep