Nope. If you're going to compare resumes, you need the official records. UD Stevens TKO Oganov RTD Findley DQ Abraham RTD Stevens KO Macklin TKO Proksa (?) Geale Golovkin's > Dirrell's
LOL. When you were working construction the wreaking ball must have hit you in the head. Dirrell's win over Abraham is listed as a W because prior to the 11rd violation Dirrell was way ahead by 97-92 on the score cards. Although in my opinion AA is not top caliber, he is still better than anything on GGG's resume. :yep Although Froch got the nod, everyone knows that Dirrell won that fight. He was robbed by England as England usually does.
Depends on how and when you beat the legend. Larry Holmes beating Ali didn't make him a legend, but his later fights did. Facing and losing to a legend is definitely better than never having faced a legend at all. :good
LOL. When you were sucking dick to make ends meet you must have choked on some serious cawk and stopped oxygenated blood from reaching your brain. Dirrell's DQ win is exactly that, a DQ win. I didn't say otherwise. What you fail to understand is that Golovkin's body of work, resume wise, trumps Dirrell's.
If you had the ability to drop someone, you wouldn't always be on your knees in front of your step-dad. :yep
A "W" is a "W". Dirrell beat Abraham and Golovkin hasn't fought anyone as good as Abraham. Stop ya wimpy whining and Deal with it. :yep
I mean you're doing it to troll and wind people up but when you look at the resumes it's a correct statement.
Ask yourself, why would people get wound up from hearing the truth, then you'd realize who the real trolls are. :yep:good