Beating Porter is 10x better than anything Amir has done. Yet we're expected to accept he deserves a shot against Floyd? :huh
problem is khan has the style to beat mayweather, kell brook doesnt, khans speed and Floyd mayweathers average punching power means hes not a Big threat to khans chin
What, throwing the same shoe-shine combo over and over again for twelve rounds? D'you know what? I agree. If there's one fighter in the world who can't adjust to that, it's Mayweather.
If he beats Brook then yes he deserves to be ahead of Khan. Brook would have a better best win but Khan would have more good wins. Well Brook seems to think he deserves a shot at Khan and Floyd has fought the likes of Guerrero, Ortiz and Maidana.
Oh, well as he has hand speed he'll automatically win. :huh Floyd would barely take a punch and has more than enough power that if he lands on that glass jaw it's game over.
Why is Porter ten times better win than Kotelnik, Maidana, Malignaggi, Judah and Collazo? Porters best wins are Alexander and Malgnaggi, Kotelnik in most peoples opinion beat Alexander and Khan has a win over Malignaggi.
Gordon Bennett, it's not hard to workout how Khan can give Floyd problems. Kell is a very good boxer but does he have anything outstanding about him that'll beat Floyd? He is a well rounded boxer that can beat most of the WW's in the division. To beat Floyd you need to have something outstanding about you, something that will trouble him and speed and volume are two things that will take Floyd out of his comfort zone. Will Khan beat him, probably not, but at least he will pose questions to Floyd. Getting back to Kell, I think he has a very good chance of beating Porter and should he wins, he will go above Khan.