Keith Thurman!! mayweather etc

I think welter is the exact weight that Thurman should be fighting at. He's only 5'7" or 5'8" and doesn't have a big frame. Not saying he couldn't eventually fight at 154 but right now he's perfect for the WW division.

 

WRONG! AGAIN!:yep

 

:rofl:rofl ok I'm not sold on Thurman myself but you sound like some delusional hater in here.

 

you do realise thurman would decapitate porter.

 

I like Porter, but he's actually fighting 2 weight classes lower than he should be.atsch

 

You obviously have absolutely no knowledge of boxing at all. If your intention is to be the forum comedian/troll your batting 1000 because I am laughing at you right now. lol

 

Greenlad you show your ignorance hardest punches don't come from your shoulders they come from the ground through your legs into your arms. Boxers evolve and learn and grow not like your finite mind that stopped working when you started smoking crack or maybe when you started sucking on brook. How many rounds have you put in the ring. If Thurman's hooks look like slaps jump in the ring with him try them out or are you an online wannabe that DKSAB :bbb

 

Who has Thurman beat? Who in the **** has Kel Brook beat?
Brook will lose to porter saturday. Porter and Thurman will fight. The best man will get floyd, and you can quote me on that.

Hate all you want, Thurman is a young champ whos entertaining as hell and regardless of what you think Thurman actually has some good boxing skills. Going through some of your posts you seem like you have no clue how boxing works, so maybe before smashing your keyboard trying to cook up a good response to this, you try and either join a gym, or watch some more vids to get a grasp on the sport and different styles.

I have designed for keith in the past, design for porter now, and have watched a bunch of their fights. Without a doubt in my mind, without holding bias, I rank them like so:

Thurman>Porter>>>>>Brook.

 

/thread