Jim watt is terrible

Watt was wrong, Brook out skilled Porter and deserved to win.................it was the two American judges who gave Brooks the win, the British judge had it a draw. Brooks out skilled Porter who was very sloppy and kept hitting Brooks behind the head............

 

Jim watt Johny Nelson are the worst pundits.

Spencor fearon please!!!

 

Watt is a nice man but has to go now, his scorecards are not even funny anymore.

 

it is time for Watt to sling his hook. i like the guy when he's not on the mic, i really do, but he's causing my ears abuse with his **** cards and repeating of the same thing over and over again. the man is like a spam bot. he could give even Farmboxer a run for his money.

 

don't mind the scorecards . this guy has the most anoying voice ever. i rather listen to broner

 

Sky is the boss of him not Eddy Hearn(Sky is even the boss of Eddy Hearn)

 

They need to get current or recently retired boxers to commentate like what they do in the US. Someone like Naz or Hatton spring to mind

 

Just a pathetically useless self hating brit. I'm done listening to the guy when it comes to brits abroad. The worst thing is that he a great commentator and really knows his his when it comes to domestic level scraps or non-brit fighters against eachother. He's just a mental basket case when it comes to his own fighters.

 

Really dont want to hear Hatton commentate...

"Brook needs to be a liccle more active."

 

Sometimes it sounds like Watt's commentary from a different fight has been overdubbed onto the fight you're watching. It's way off the mark sometimes that it's becomes absolutely bizarre to watch and listen to it, an absolute mindfu*k at times. The Psychedelic commentator.

 

Didn't he also have a scorecard in Froch-Groves 2 of like 6-1 to Froch before the stoppage?

He also had Valeuv beating Haye.

 

Ian Darke was the man , I think he does football now , but he really knew how to call a fight.

Jim is just too far gone.