Potential fights where 75% of others disagree with your picks

No they wouldn't.

I'm not sure what it would be but I reckon most on here would pick Khan at this point:

http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=495961

Glad you agree though :good

 

Whatever SH, you asked for a pick most wouldn't agree with.

I think you picking Thurman over Khan is wrong, you make your pick, I'll make mine.

I actually picked Maidana to beat Broner unlike you!

 

Im a Khan fan anyway and think its a mismatch. Don't think Broner sees the 10th personally.

 

Yeah im less convinced with that pick but id still put money on it if the odds were good maidana might be too relentless but i think he might be too slow too

 

Well then, your prediction was wrong.

---

And you shouldn't make a thread asking for very bold predictions and then post little laughing smiley faces when someone makes a very bold prediction that you happen to not agree with.

---

On another note, British posters continue to surprise me. Their bias favoritism is unbelievable.

 

1. I don't think I've ever decisively said that first point you make because I've never decisively sat down and thought about it. Obviously it's something to sit down and debate with what you value in victories; not an opinion to be made on a whim.

2. Dawson is more HOF worthy than Froch if they both retired today, now that you mention it, but I'm pretty sure I've never actually said that directly on ESB either.

3. I never said there's "nothing wrong with Mayweather beating up his wife" I just don't hold people's personal lives against them when I don't know them or the case. I like boxers professionally, not personally. You know this, Hans, as we just had that debate yesterday or the day before.

4. I never said that Pacquiao is a bad person for killing chickens. Was just bringing that up in the sake of that previous conversation to show the hypocrisy of others; based on some peoples' statements that should factor in to their preference of the fighter. Not to me, though. Don't play dumb, Hans. You know I repeatedly said then and well before that conversation that I don't care about any of that stuff.

5. I've said many times on the Mayweather/Pacquiao subject that neither side wanted the fight and boxing politics in general plus Arum is more to point at than either fighter. But yes, if I have to blame one party, I'm blaming the one party that admitted to walking away from the table during the first negotiations when the fight was biggest and meant the most. But I've never said it's "Pacquiao's fault alone" in the manner you imply.

6. Maidana did deserve to be ranked ahead of Porter. Transnational Boxing Rankings, the consensus best ranking system in the world, agreed with me then and still does even after Brook beat Porter. But as you've implied it to be, my reasoning isn't solely from defeating Broner.

So for someone who claims to know my posting ways and what I've said, you have struck out on all 6 of your points. Thank you for your time. Please be somewhat accurate next time.

 

Andre Dirrell beating Golovkin

 

Pulev tko WK

 

Thurman would stop Khan in the first round