Prime for prime who would have won ricky hatton v kell brook at welterweight

Hatton was never prime at 147. I think Brook by KO

 

Hatton who lost to mayweather = Hatton
Hatton who lost to Collazo = Brook

Yes I know the Collazo fight was before but it was a better welterweight version of Hatton

 

Brook. Hatton was not a welterweight even Mayweather stopped him at that weight.

 

Brook. Hatton is a 140 figther. Kell is far to big and with Hatton being reckless, Kell would of hit him at will and maybe even stopped him.

 

It's a tough one but I think Brook would outbox and outpoint Hatton

 

Brook a big WW, Good stiff jab, good defence, physically stronger and bigger.
brook UD.

 

We haven't seen a prime Kell Brook yet so who knows

 

Brook. Hatton had a very narrow window in which he was effective. He didn't gain any power or endurance with the extra 7lb, it only slowed him down.

 

I agree hatton when peaked it was a short reign at the top of his powers. I think he was overrated, brook i think would stop him easy, just too big at a weight hatton was never comfortable at

 

When did Hatton ever lose to Collazo?

 

Kell. Hatton was excellent at JW but his strengths were not as effective at WW

 

Brooke. Hatton wasn't at his best AT WW.

 

Not a fair comparison. Hatton was prime at 140. pound for pound he is miles above Brook but at 147 i would say 50/50. Dont think we have seen the best of Brook yet, hope not anyway.

 

Im not the biggest fan of Hatton as I think he didn't use any of his natural skills to their fullest over his career, but the Hatton that fought Mayweather was able to land punches only a handful of fighters have been able to do.

Hatton by close but clear decision.