Bradley Saunders next fight..?

You and Stevie are trying to derail the thread with the usual FW crap - let's stick to the topic which is Bradley Saunders and the belief that some have got that he would be better off somehow with fast Eddie rather then FW who is moving him along very well as he alway does.

 

Who said FW is a god? I said he is the best at moving a kid from the start of their career upwards - maybe Hearn will raise the bar in years to come but at the moment he has no track record of this which again led me to dismiss the idea that he would be doing a better job with somebody like Saunders then frank- I don't see the difficulty in understanding this.

No promoter is perfect - we could go on for hours but why are you not asking why George Groves went and signed for Sauerlands and had to force his way onto sky instead of signing with a Matchroom? Why is Barry Mcguigan refusing to deal with Hearn so far? Why is joe Gallagher taking open shots at Hearn for failing to move Quigg and Crolla forwards to proper fights? Why did Eubank Snr refuse to deal with Eddie and instead demanded to deal with Hearn snr instead before signing with BN??

Let's not make out that everybody in boxing wants to kiss Hearns backside - the same way people in boxing will critisize FW or Hennessy etc

 

Not derailing anything, your comment he was the best in business doesnt quite ring true at bringing fighters through as he has tried and on some occasions so far succesfully screwed fighters over in their world title bouts with regards to pay and actual fights not being made.

Has Eddie ever done this?

Again you dismiss it with 'FW crap' like its lies. Its the truth and is valid, you cant accept that it seems.

Hearn isnt perfect, no one claims he is but we accept that Frank is flawed mate.

As for Gallagher taking shots at Eddie, thats interesting! I didnt know that but people in boxing circles claimed it was Joe who wouldnt push Quigg on? Smoke and mirrors perhaps, or maybe Eddie isnt doing what they want. He tried for LSC, wonder if it was his substitute that rankled Joe?

 

Your determined to go down down the screwed/none payment of fighters route again..great..
Let me guess Calzaghe? Well can I suggest you go and read the actual papers from the judge..Joe hardly came out smelling of roses - go and read it..who else Burns, Mitchell it's all boring mate and I can probably come up with counter arguments on all of them and again it's old and boring and simply not relevant.

Go and read some of gallaghers recent interviews leading upto the Manchester card..he was direct when saying that Hearn isn't delivering and he was tired if taking flack for cack opponents being shipped over.

 

Determined? No its relevant to the discussion, part of bringing through a fighter is paying them whether you like it or not.

As for counter arguments, he didnt pay people what he agreed, what else is there to say?

Interesting from Joe, wonder what Hearns response will be?

 

Go and find me a quote from any of the following fighters complaining about not being paid or screwed

Mitchell smith, Buglioni, Georgie Keane, Skeete, BJS, Macarinelli, Gavin, Saunders, Liam Walsh, Liam Smith etc etc

 

Why? i could say you go and find me one of where Hearn hasnt?

The fact is youre saying Frank is the best in britain at taking fighters from domestic to World titles, well some of the ones he has, havent been paid for doing so-not a great feat is it.

Of the ones you mentioned incidentally, how many are world titlists?

Hearn is bringing his stable along nicely too for the most part, not all of them but most so maybe give it 12-18 months and maybe you will find Frank isnt the only one with pedigree in what youre claiming Frank to be best at.

 

Terrible announcing a fight before it has even been signed. Genuinely not surprised with anything ****** does these days. He's been at it for years.

 

Because your going on about non payment of fighters etc as if this is what is happening with all if his fighters routinely which is simply not true otherwise you would be able to back it up. Not every fighter is going to make it to world level obviously and that's the same for Hearns stable.

As for Eubank - Saunders I will be opening fire on FW if he's fcuked this up.

 

you must work for fw is it andy arse licker:happy

 

Frank should bring Humberto soto over for him

 

When did Frank last sell 80,000 at Wembley? How many World Champions does Frank currently have?

 

To be fair that was a one off, purely down to Howard Foster and George groves - easy promotion

bit like Haye Chisora - easy promoting

On topic, frank is the best in the business at guiding a young fighter to world title opportunities - proven time and time again.

Eddie has not been in the game long enough to have had the opportunity to guide a young fighter to world honours - next 18 months will be intresting with the Yafai's, ward, smith etc

As it stands frank is the man

 

Please. How long have you been following boxing..3 years?
Surley not even Solaris and Mufc etc would question franks history of staging the biggest events in The UK bringing Tyson over, Bringing over Tszyu P4P No2, Haye-Chisora without BBBoC approval, Bruno-McCall etc

wembley was brilliant but it was a freak event Interms of backstory and if you had sky at your disposal any idiot could have promoted that. froch was already Hearns fighter and Groves was basically a free agent - it was hardly a political mindfield to get those fights on. Infact sky where basically the main promoter, it was there money, infrastructure etc Hearn was acting as more of an agent of sky for that event as he holds the promoter license.

As for World champs Hearns stable is not exactly brimming with them - and I'm not measuring that as how successful he is anyway. Froch and Brook legitimate and McDonnell and Quigg with pretend belts and I missing anyone?

 

What a Boring ****ing thread I thought it was supposed to be about Bradley saunders not ****** vs Hearn beefing