kovalev is slow? His punches are straight, fast and powerful. I'll be very surprised and impressed if BHOP goes 12. at 49 BHOP against a skillfull puncher is too much.
I take it this is another brilliant work of Pugilistic Surrealism, Right? I prefer the Pugilistic Dadaism that Kovalev will reign down upon BHop's decrepit old coot ass.
If Hopkins doesn't beat Kovalev, there's a good chance you won't ever be able to watch another Hopkins fight again.
You like headbuttsclinches and fouls all night. over devasting clean combinations coming from a cool calm collected killer like kovalev? stevenson vs kovalev = FOTY Beterbiev vs kovalev = FOTY Ward vs kovalev = FOTY Hopkins vs Ward = bore of the century hopkins vs stevenson = clinch of the century beterbiev vs hopkins = destruction of the century (the old man dies) If you want skill look at rigondeaux or mayweather they dont need lead with there missile shaped heads, and they can land more than 5 clean punches a night! :deal
Hopkins is going to get hit in the head and complain that it hurts in the balls by way of moaning like a girl.
Kovalev is not slow, not at all.......................Hopkins plans on cheating, he will have his personal referee, judges, boxing commission and Larry Hazzard is his best friend.........................Hazzard will have to protect Hopkins. Hopkins will fall down on the canvas claiming foul like he did with Dawson. Dawson beat Hopkins, Taylor, Calzaghe, etc., so who says that Hopkins has never lost a fight? Pavlik was a middleweight, Tito was a weltherweight...............................
The only thing Kovalev asked for was that the fight be fair. I can't see Hopkins fighting without holding, headbutting, low blows, etc., I remember when Dawson beat him and Calzaghe................