A guy posts a very unbias opinion, and gets blasted because it doesn't accord with others opinions? atsch
Max asked Harold why did he have 2 rounds to 1, 4 to 2, and 6 to 3 for Winky and if it was for too much clinching and Lederman showed little bias by saying that you have to look really closely and see who's doing the precise punching ( at the mean time, Hopkins was driving rights home on Winky at a steady pace)... Like Max said it again in the end of this last one, boxing is not to be judged by being aesthetically pleasing but effective. Calzaghe won it on handspeed and volume of punches but he took the more accurate and sharper shots most of the time. I like to take everything that can make me limp-dicked and induce schizofrenia in the process, mescaline, harmine, LSD6, bufotenine, muscarine, bulbocapnine, barbiturates, dihydro-oxy-heroin, demerol, stimulation with aphrodisiacs, self-embarassment to prevent relief of masturbation and the list goes on and on.
:rofl :rofl :rofl You're a funny guy and I take your point. Being in Canada I missed the Winky-Hopkins fight but I saw Joe take over that fight with Bernard after being hurt in Rd 1 and yes he was hurt. None of this flash knockdown crap. Joe was hurt. But I saw Joe just adjust by the end of round four and impose his speed and "volume of punches" and more importantly establish his right jab. Anyhow, I think I'll stop with Prozac. Those chemicals listed above just have too many syllables for my taste.
:rofl He's obviously an alias of some Bernie nuthugger. Hopkins fans should be angry that Hops fought that way, with all the clinching & faked low blows, etc. Pathetic.