Aethetics don't win fights....and Calzaghe is still 45-0

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Biff_McBiff, Apr 25, 2008.


Page 2 of 2
  1. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    1) I agree that Calzaghe had Kessler figured out from before the fight, and constructed a gameplan based solely on negating or spoiling if you will to ruin Kesslers' boxing. When Kessler gassed at round 6, he adjusted back to his own style. Having said that, this was Calzaghe at his best - for once he had the right about of respect for his opponent, and it showed; much less slaps, and more correct punches.

    2) You talk up Dawson, while criticising Calzaghes' resume? Dawson has only beaten Adamek and an old, but still good roadwarrior in Johnson. Calzaghes' resume outweighs Dawsons by a mile...

    3) You think that Kessler and Lacy has limitations, but not Dawson? He makes tons of youthful mistakes... Mistakes that a clever warrior like Calzaghe will exploit.
     
    DanePugilist, Apr 26, 2008
    DanePugilist, Apr 26, 2008
    #16
  2. Biff_McBiff

    Biff_McBiff New Member Full Member

    46
    0
    Jun 11, 2006

    Aethetics...yeah, you know, as Mr. Webster defines, the study or theory of beauty and the psycological responses to it. Or to put a finer point on it, (not a reference to my head) the opposite of Joe Calzaghe's boxing style.

    Still undefeated. So I guess I'll just have to wait until Joe fights someone NOT COLLECTING SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS.
     
    Biff_McBiff, Apr 26, 2008
    Biff_McBiff, Apr 26, 2008
    #17
Page 2 of 2