So you're telling me that the official testing anti-doping organisation of the United will be willing to jeopardize their reputation and integrity just to make an inroad into boxing? Compared to other sports organisation which USADA is contracted by, the amount of profit the could make in boxing is almost negligent compared to what they get from these organisations. Even if that was the case why will a boxer object to the testing procedure of USADA unless he's doping. If pac and his team where suspicious about USADA, the could also have involved another anti-doping organization into the matter just in case USDA comes up with something shady.
Not contradictory. I won't say he is because I don't know but he's suspicious. Since he's suspicious, I wouldn't be surprised. He didn't gain knockout power. Here's a few points 1. His KO percentage is roughly the same as Pac's. 2. Muscle gain can be a different workout regimen and diet. 3. Pacquiao was moving into the punch, increasing its impact.
i wanna say probly not simply because with regards to the physical proof and inconsistencies that i seen in JMM physical self, he did offer in the leadup to the 4th fight to do any additional testing aslong as pac himself underwent the same treatment and pacs team declined
Pretty much. There are different types of PEDs. Not a single boxer would surprise me if they weren't.
That's why he's suspicious. Edit: chest boils/Acne is not confirmation. It's not proof, it's evidence. I've been suspicious of Pac as well as Marquez. I argue with people claiming he's doping because they only claim it because he beat Pacquiao.
And what about his hiring of the most notorious doping chemist in US doping history? You know that Memo is the guy behind BALCO right? :roll: