Pac a coward???

:good
I salute you

 

you talking to divac?!!!

just make a poll and what ever it is if it favors JMM!

IT's certified TRUTH!

I don't want to be specific that there are robberies/incompetent judges but you BELIEVING THAT JMM NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER LOST?

Who's insane but disguised as sane here?!

By the way Divac, everytime you are asked do you believe " pac is coward " I believe you have never categorically said your stand.. in other words,, you are the one apprearing coward! :hi:

everytime somebody confronts you what would you say? you pactart is ****** coz i'm not the one saying that it's this writer. obviously you are insunuating that you agree!

You are lucky coz you are COWARD! you know why? coz if you took the bet you could have been banished !!!!

So you are DAMN lucky coward!

Now! If the fight HAPPENS again.


Lifetime BAN, 6 months. 3 months.. name it! You would not do the bet again coz you are the TRUE COWARD of ALL!!!!

you will have your own set of excuses why you don't want the bet coz you want to be heard correct?! Ok i said you can log on for a week or the length of time you could still log on but YOU NEVER NEVER took the BET!!!

In fact, if will look at how many pacfans was willing for a month bet. there wer 30+ if not mistaken but do you KNOW how many JMM fans made the bet? Less than 5 brave members there?

You see, wether you like it or not you
are LUCKY COWARD jmm fan!

I have more respect on those who made a DECISION to bet on their FIGHTER/BOXER! Unlike you... you are all talk talk talk!!!! No action.

In fairness you are good writer but you are likewise the REAL LARGER THAN LIFE TRUE LUCKY COWARD!!!!!

You seem to be the #1 JMM fan! But when it comes to putting in practice what you BELIEVE!!!!!

DAMN! You are the MOST COWARD OF THEM ALL!!!!

All talk! If confronted by pacfans on the issue calling pac a coward..

What would you say... hey! listen up! cool down! it wasn't me it's this writer... IF YOU ARE BRAVE! Yes, it was "x" WHO said it and I agree 101% DID YOU EVER SAY/SAID that?!

Of course not! COZ YOU ARE CERTIFIED COWARD! It's been proven! :deal :hi: :hi:

Oh I forgot you are also a CRY BABY :|

what a loooong name...:rofl

A LUCKY COWARD CRY BABY!!!! that's more like it!:happy

Its been two months and counting and you are still :| :| :| :| ?

Get on with you life:thumbsup

 

A simple question for you divac please answer this one...

Do believe that Pac is a coward?

If your answer is YES then kindly please explain why, now if your answer is NO then this thread is over.

 

Another piece of **** post I didn't bother to finish reading. :yep

 

Pac does not refuse to fight JMM again ,i think it would be better to
fight other fighters on 130 lb division or at 135ib,and he should think back weather to fight JMM again to prove who will be the clear winner,
thats probably a deciding fight for the two.

 

How bout you sharpen your comprehension skills and answer my simple question directed to you. The title of the thread is asking is pac a coward? most of the people here said NO! Now since you're the TS you should have your own stand... don't be a coward and answer the question.

My question is directed to you please don't twist the **** out. :good


BTW silver had a point... why didn't you accept the bet? i smell *****...:yep

 

a JMMoron believes that jmm has never lost a fight despite his official record having 4 losses. and that knockdown DID decide the rematch. i had it 6-6 and the KD was the difference. pac therefore won because of it.

 

where's my answer divac?

 

here it is

 

I stopped believing in people who scored rounds 11 and 12 in the first jmm-pac fight for JMM. I made a poll several months ago on how to score a fight and used the 11 and 12 rounds of the first JMM-Pac fight as the basis for making as much as possible an objective score.

Some nuthugger scored both rounds for JMM. And there is no wisdom debating with them because obviously they are blinded by their love for JMM.

As a Pacfan, just because we see that it is possible the decision could have favored JMM does not mean that we are admitting that JMM won. The fact is that the fight have been so close that even if JMM had the nod, it would not be a problem as long as the scorecards are close and reflective of how the fight unfolded ( not like the JMM-MAB where the judges need to be shot for scoring lopsided scores for JMM).

The fight is almost a month old yet some people (including JMM) can not move on. There are a lot of fights that could be made even for JMM. Pac already has a fight lined up. JMM might as well take a championship fight and who knows, the paths of Pac and JMM might cross again. I am sure that a third fight is going to happen because of the huge financial gains by both parties. Even the second fight had difficulty taking off at the start yet when dollar started to talk, it was done in a jiffy.

 

I want him to answer my question directed to him not to the author... all i'm asking is a yes or no and why?


Divac's agenda is as clear as day he is just hiding in someone else's article... not very brave if you ask me. Now if he wants to Cry how JMM schooled PAC twice and that JMM won those fights then let him make a thread on that.


Good luck to JMM i hope he fights other good boxers and not waste his time running after a "coward" fighter like pac.

 

i think i get divac's point and his enemy are the pac fans...he would want everyone to agree with him. Sure he did brought out arguments.

 

hatton and campbell is more of a threat to pacquiao than jmm, wanting to fight them is not an act of cowardice.

guzman is more of a problem to jmm than pac, is it an act of cowardice that jmm won't fight guzman?

A fighter gets more praised if he takes the fights which give him more danger and wins right?