GLAZKOV is everything wrong with boxing...

Can't believe the Malik Scott butthurt is still going strong. It was a DRAW, Fellas. Accept it and move on with your lives.

 

Haa winning 4 rounds now constitutes a controversial decision I guess.

There was not a damn thing controversial about Broner - Malignaggi. Yes, it was a competitive fight, but giving 7 or more rounds to Paulie would be erroneous at best.

 

Glazkov has those 3 fights, Rossy, Cunningham, and Scott, that have been seen as controversial to some.

Personally I have him 1-1-1. I think he beat Rossy, drew with Cunningham, and lost cleanly to Scott.

The Rossy and Cunningham fights he is 2-0 in and I don't have a problem with that. He could also be 0-2 in them and I wouldn't see anything wrong there. He could be 2-0 or 0-2 or anything in between in my opinion.

The Scott loss was pretty clear though and with Scott coming off a minor win over Leapai and having some major exposure with the Wilder and Chisora fights now would be a good time for a Glazkov-Scott rematch.

With Glazkov having a fight with Wlad secured(I think) I doubt he fights anyone with a pulse, if he fights at all, until he lands that Wlad fight.

 

He clearly lost last night

 

What did Glazkov did wrong? i am no fan of the guy but if hes getting gift decisions its not his fault, hes not fighting and filling in the scorecards in between rounds is he? But You're a known moron so i dont expect you to understand this, maybe someone can paint something up for you maybe then you understand but knowing you i doubt it.

 

He lost to Scott and last night I scored fight a draw but was more impressed with Cunningham. Rossy faded late and lost by a pt or felt.

 

To be fair, the last person to beat Cunningham clearly, was ATG Tyson Fury.

 

Sorry to say but around round 8 I felt that Cunningham was letting it slip away. Cunningham was starting to **** me off because he was pushing out his punches. He looked like he could not land a flush shot. I was thinking here is a guy who knocked out a guy who outweighed him by 70 pounds the fight before and he cannot seem to trade evenly with a guy about 10 pounds heavier. Maybe it is because he is more of a counter puncher, but I saw the fight slipping away from his success in the first 4 or 5 rounds. Throughout the fight Glazkov was the aggressor moving forward and towards the end Cunningham looked gased, when he normally has that stamina. I was a little surprised by the disparity in the scoring and expected a draw or split decision. Cunningham should go back to being a cruiser.

 

Didn't you do threads on Lephikin and Taishan Dong? IMO they're more worthless than Glazkov:nono

 

I don't hate Glazkov, he's a decent boxer, kind of dull, B or B- level.
He should continue to appear on Kovalev's under-card until IBF forces a mando which is not until early next year.

 

Now that Sven Ottke has retired somebody has to carry on the tradition and Glazkov is doing it without the benefit of German judges:nut


114-114 BTW so for me it wasn't that outrageous:deal

 

What about PDL and Quintero, then? Giving Broner those wins, on any planet, would be erroneous at best.

 

I'll add Broener to that list.

 

PDL and Quintero... please watch those fights.