Robinson Was Dropped 10 Times In His Career!!

Ok, rather than respond to each and every one of the posts I will address them all as a whole. First of all, thanks for proving my point that you guys are categorical Robinson nuthuggers. Go back and read your posts and tell me that you are not totally incapable of being objective and even entertaining the thought of a modern fighter being as good or better than your God. If someone were new to boxing, they would think "Jesus, this Robinson dude must have been flawless. Did he ever even lose? Did he ever get dropped? Does his **** even stink? Did he walk on water? Heal the blind?"

My arguement that Mayweather is as good or better is based on a combination of things and not just the fact that he is undefeated. Most of you guys who claim to be experts have only seen a little bit of footage of him. There's no footage of him at 147lbs, and we can only go by what they have. All you people who claim to know how good his opposition was are simply parroting what other posters have said. You don't know what the **** you are talking about. You guys are in your 20's and 30's and don't know any more than I do. Also, I've been in the ring, how many have you?

Common sense tells you that in any era, when you fight as often as he did, you will face a ton of bums. Boxing is arguably the toughest sport to compete in, but the easiest to break into. There is no draft ala the NFL, NBA, and NHL. If you can pass the medical tests and are in reasonably good physical condition, they will license you. This allows for a ton of guys who are technically "professional boxers" because they are getting paid, but are seriously lacking in the skills department.

For a guy that had almost 200 fights, if there were as many great fighters as you guys claim, that would mean that he should have faced around 30-40 A level and potentially Hall of Fame fighters (which he didn't). That would mean that 15-20% of his opponents were A level. Someone named 13 "great" fighters that he faced 13 is only about 7% of the amount of fights he had, which means that around 93% of his oppoents were not A level opponents. Mayweather has had 39 fights and I named 6 A level fighters he has faced which amounts to about 15% of his opponents.

Robinson had about 5 times the amount of fights that Mayweather had, and per capita faced less A level fighters!! Also, even if someone came up with more A level fighters that Robinson faced, to not factor in the disparity in the number of fights each fighter had would be retarted. Even in spite of the disparity, there is only a difference of 6 or 7. Also, you guys don't know **** about the fighters you are listing, you've only seen footage of them against Robinson (if you've even seen that).

Fighters are better now than back in the day. They are more athletic, have better training methods, better nutrition, and the sport is older and thus more knowledge has been attained. Anybody who argues with this is a moron. Athletes in every sport are better now than in the past. It's no disrespect to the old-time fighters it's just a fact. 40 years from now I will be saying the same thing about fighters then compared to the ones now. It's a natural evolution, and I would not argue with it. To answer the person's question about who I pick in a H2H matchup between Mayweather and Robinson I pick Mayweather based on superior defense and intellect. Oh my God, I'm going to hell ---I just suggested that someone would actually defeat Jesus Christ, I mean Sugar Ray Robinson.