The Cruiser division is in a shambles. The top 3 guys refuse to face each other. Huck should move up. His stamina can't handle the weight cut anymore and he fights nothing but no name euro bums anyway.
aha ok, so if it is so easy for you what about that: Fury beat Cunningham :deal Hernandez beat Cunningham twice In your eyes it tells us Hernandez>Fury Fury needed 7 Rounds for the stoppage Hernandez needed 6 Rounds for the stoppage In your eyes it tells us Hernandez>Fury The world can be so easy if we all would think and belive like brainless People like you Baby :bbb Huck>Fury thats it, but we never will see it cause Huck would directly get on the ducking list of Fury, like Wlad, Pulev, Ustinov etc... :hi:
Just think about this scenario. Wlad retires shortly after collecting all the belts and defending it once. All belts end up for grabs and the #1 and #2 at the time (probably Povetkin in the mix) fight it out for the vacant lineal/Ring and some other belt. Then Huck moves in against the winner (again, probably Povetkin) and upsets the apple cart. After that he starts defending his new belts, including his WBO CW belt exclusively at 200, with wich Floydettes are in agreement of course because 200 is within the CW and HW limit :!: Would anyone call that fair, or would everybody scream their lungs out for a guy holding the HW championship hostage? :think
Nevermind that Huck/Cunningham was 7 years prior to Cunningham/Fury. Alot happened in that time. Huck got better, Cunningham aged and got worse.
Just imagine if CW was folded as a weight class, and the bigger ones went to HW and the smaller ones went down to LHW. Imagine how stacked those weight classes would be. CW is a very underrated division, with a lot of talent. Very likely that we see guys like Kudryashov, and Usyk try their luck out at HW in the future. Huck will probably only go up if he can land a fight with Wlad, or if he sees the division as being "open" when Wlad to retire and tries to fight for a vacant strap.
Hernandez beat cunningham on a cut not a legit knockout. Cunningham got destroyed by fury, cunningham destroyed huck. If you win you win. Fury woul absolutely smash huck into retirement. Why don't you get it casual? Didn't Hernandez win on a cut a headbutt. He didn't send cunningham down for 10 seconds, so your point is void. Fury > cunningham > huck.
May I also remind you that fury is undefeated. Cunningham is often robbed. And cunningham destroyed hick. Lebedev also beat hick but was robbed. Fury wouldn't be robbed in Germany or anywhere he would knock huck clean out.
To be fair, Fury fouled Cunningham into tho KO with Holding his head and throwing a Punch :deal Hernandez in the rematch knocked Cunningham out twice and he just came back on feed in time with wobbeling legs.. Huck would beat the sh!t out of Gypsy "the Ducker" Fury :deal
Just look at McDermott vs Fury I and tell me again that he should be undefeated and McD wasn't robbed. Also I have never seen Fury knock a man clean out up 'till now. Why do you think he can manage that against someone as sturdy as Huck?
So you think prime 30 year old Cruiser Cunningham in 2007=36 year old HW Cunningham in 2013. I don't see the basis for a comparision. And Cunningham hardly destroyed Huck. It was a brutal competitive fight with Cunningham stopping Huck on his feet in the last round.
Because styles make fights, and cunningham was have never been knocked before and after he faced fury. And I rate cunningham higher than huck. Especially as a hw. Hick wouldn't go the distance against povetkin again. Tha povetkin was pretty sluggish and unmotivated.
I'd say a 260lb 6'9 fury is a far more dangerous fighter than cunningham and I rate USS. I just don't think at 200lbs, he wasn't a big puncher and now he's a small puncher but skilful. But fury would decimate hick. Who barely throw a punch against lebedev in fear of getting ko'd.....
If you saw the fight, it was clear that Fury had to resort to fouling to eventually get the come from behind win. Also USS wasn't "clean out". And what about the "undefeated" part? Do you disagree on that also?