Mayweather Vs. Pacquiao: The ONLY Fight Where Variables Are No Longer Variables!!!

Zimornsky back on the excuses train. Pacquiao was smaller in 09, '10, '12, and still is in '15. Man up, Pacquiao doesn't need you to make excuses for him.

 

mayweather has quit in his heart he just never fought any one decent for the quit to show

 

:deal

 

I'm trying to understand what he is talking about. Either something is a variable or it is a constant. At least that's what I was taught. To say a variable is not a variable doesn't make any sense to me.

 

Floyd also confirms he is a big welter.

 

The guy who is 2 years older holds EVERY physical advantage?

 

Thanks for responding but your initial post still doesn't make any sense in the context of the title and your comments above.

 

Mayweather is also 2 years older than hatton does that mean hatton is fresher?

These fools need to learn boxing

 

Love this, can't wait to see the threads after the fight. All the fanboyism has almost reached its climax. After May 2 there's going to be hurt feelings from 1 camp.
The louder your fanboy is on here the more hurt you will be. It seems the biggest haters are the biggest supporters. You make more noise then everyone, creat more threads then everyone on the guy you hate.

 

lol I've already read it several times and it still didn't make any sense. That's why I asked you to explain it. I have a technical background and tend to look at terms like "variable" in only one way. Either something is a variable or it's not. I can't conceive when a variable is not a variable. But anyway, go on with your trolling.

 

Learn boxing? You have no cojones. Since the fights been signed you've made nothing but excuses. Have some damn faith and stop whining. It should be an easy fight for Pacquiao right? Since you did say that Floyd lost to Maidana and nearly was "KOd". Somehow he's still "near prime" though.

 

I think you wanted to discuss intangibles and not variables. You may have misunderstood the meaning of the word "variable" OK!