Glass Jaw Danny Jacobs or Quillin must fight GGG

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rico Spadafora, Apr 24, 2015.


  1. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    Jacobs worse nightmare would be having an iron chin vs GGG.

    Those dumbo ears of his would both be ripped apart as if Tyson was having a smorgasbord on his head.:lol::lol::lol:
     
  2. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,890
    Apr 14, 2009
    Why Jacobs?? who's he ducked? Quillin yeah He needs to step up. But the one that's BLATANTLY ducking GGG is that quitter Miguel Cotto. He claims he's the lineal 160 pound champ he needs to grow a set. I guess he's waiting hoping GGG gets hurt & he can face him less than 100%. Cotto likes to fight guys with only one good eye , only one good leg or a guy who's legs are totally shot.
     
  3. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    80,400
    131,822
    Jul 21, 2009
    Fast twitch? More like fast b*tch once they'd tasted that power. They'd be the ones who were ''track minded''. Hell, Quillin has already got a taste of it in sparring and he's been running in the opposite direction since. :deal
     
  4. drozzy

    drozzy AERE Full Member

    12,271
    29
    Nov 2, 2010
    Andre Dirrell's super motherfukkin fast twitch muscles weren't a problem for GGG. And Dirrell walks all over Jacobs & Quillin.
     
  5. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    Like I said I'm not expecting objectivity here just stating my opinion, I do a lot of betting and I'll stick with opinions though I respect the dedication to ignorance....I don't have "favorites" I admire some fighters more than others so I don't catch a fit when I mention the nuances that may or may not cause an issue if two fighter where to mix it up in the squared circle. I like GGG but you folks have this foregone conclusion that he walks through all other contenders with no resistance and the mere mention of opposition enrages you. It's hilarious....fast *****? Lmao I gotcha man sorry for adding some grey in your black and white world. Typical
     
  6. drozzy

    drozzy AERE Full Member

    12,271
    29
    Nov 2, 2010
    Who's "enraged"? :lol:

    Did you ever watch the Golovkin-Dirrell fights? Do you honestly believe Jacobs has the footwork to elude Golovkin more than Andre did?

    Calling someone ignorant for stating an opinion that differs to yours is, well, ignorant. ;)
     
  7. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    80,400
    131,822
    Jul 21, 2009
    You do realize Quillin has already turned down a shot against Golovkin before the Cold War and before he had a belt of his own wrapped round his waist don't you? Golovkin has worked him over in sparring and too.. his ''fast twitch'' didn't help him out there. Contrary to what they say in interviews, neither Quillin or Jacobs are interested. That much is abundantly clear. Jacobs may well be in the future but not now he isn't.

    And I'm not remotely enraged. I'm also pretty level headed and conservative when it comes to making predictions about fighters I support too. I don't dislike Quillin or Jacobs - they're both good guys and pretty good fighters - but I just think Golovkin is too strong for both of them and I think they feel the same way too.
     
  8. Kush

    Kush Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,095
    980
    Dec 16, 2007
    Jacobs doesnt need to fight GGG for his belt.

    Als about to give him the PBJ middleweight belt
     
  9. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    The ignorance comes from the polarized views not the fact that we may agree to disagree I'm a lot of things but a Hippocrate I will not accept lol
     
  10. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    Understood I give GGG the edge as well
     
  11. drozzy

    drozzy AERE Full Member

    12,271
    29
    Nov 2, 2010
    Funny that you were able to spell polarized but not hypocrite. Hippos are cool, I suppose. :think

    Still no feedback on Dirrell/Golovkin/Jacobs? Very well then. Now I'll go polarize my lawn with that motorized thingy, hippo you have a good day.
     
  12. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,386
    3,797
    Feb 20, 2008
    'Catch weight' Cotto is a disgrace. He needs to just drop the bet and go fight at 154.
     
  13. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,386
    3,797
    Feb 20, 2008
    Oh I have no doubt Jacobs or Quillin could run and scamper around the ring and 'survive'. I am talking about if they are to you know actually fight GGG and try to win not just 'survive'. Jacobs would get obliterated and savagely KOed. Quillin would probably fare slightly better but he seems very very mentally weak when the subject of GGG comes up. That is a very bad thing for a prizefighter.
     
  14. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    80,400
    131,822
    Jul 21, 2009
    They can both punch, problem is Golovkin can do the same with interest and he's much more sturdy than they are too, especially Jacobs. I can't see either lasting the distance against him. Jacobs is too fragile and Quillin just doesn't have the ability to stop Golovkin from doing what he do. A match up between Jacobs and Quillin would be more interesting. I wouldn't mind seeing that, if they both came to fight that is.
     
  15. cippi

    cippi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,155
    888
    Feb 28, 2009
    maybe they will fight eachother