Which If Best Top Ten List

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by OLD FOGEY, May 3, 2008.


  1. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,315
    299
    Jul 23, 2004
    Lewis and Holmes should be in the top 5 IMO.
     
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,195
    49,488
    Apr 27, 2005
    So wot list do you like the most Rob?
     
  3. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    List B is bert sugar's list



    I like list A D E. list D is very strong langford and walcott are two very good dark horse candinates for top 10, they have strong resumes and have beaten alot of big heavyweights.
     
  4. groove

    groove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,056
    26
    May 16, 2006
    List D for me. Change 9 and 10 to Foreman and Tyson then it's a good list.
     
  5. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,776
    322
    Dec 12, 2005
    E.... with serious reservations.
     
  6. Seasoned Veteran

    Seasoned Veteran Member Full Member

    168
    0
    Apr 18, 2008
    Tough choice.

    List A has Rocky first so that is wrong.

    List C has Floyd Patterson so that is wrong.

    List D is pretty good although Walcott is too high.

    List E is ok too, although I would put Holyfield lower.

    List B is my favourite though, al old school view of the rankings.
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    list A has all the right names so it is the best
     
  8. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Probably list D because at least it has Sam Langford, so does list C but having Patterson at #3 is a joke, personally wouldn't have Bivins near my top 10 either.

    No Lennox Lewis in any though is a bit worrying as someone said.
     
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    Going by Jimmy Bivins resume........you can make a small case for him to be rated top 20 but not top 10. On film Bivins is impressive with his octupus long 80" reach and his intellectual boxing brain to go along with his scientific boxing skills. I have Bivins right around my top 50, but I rate Lee Q murray and elmer ray higher than him.
     
  10. OLD FOGEY

    OLD FOGEY Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,670
    99
    Feb 18, 2006

    List B is Bert Sugar's list. I will post where all the lists came from on Wednesday.
     
  11. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,315
    299
    Jul 23, 2004
    None of them.
     
  12. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Same here.
     
  13. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    I think C is the worst. I think E is the best.
     
  14. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,195
    49,488
    Apr 27, 2005
    Ok, which one do you dislike the least?
     
  15. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    279
    Oct 4, 2005
    List C is without doubt worst. Patterson at 3 is a joke, but then again, if someone with 3 fights against heavyweight contenders makes #5 and Bivins #9, anything is possible.

    List B is pretty awful too, again with Tunney at #5. Might as well put Ike Ibeabuchi #6 then. :nut

    List E has Holyfield way too high. Other than that it's good.

    List's A and D are both pretty good. I would say list D is slightly better; i think List A's #4-#10 are better than D's, but Marciano at #1 is a bit too much for me, so i'll go with D as the best list.

    So, in order from bad (in this case horrible) to pretty good:


    bad
    C
    B
    E
    A
    D
    good








    I think it's worth pointing out that not a single one of these lists has Wills in the top10. And these are probably lists from big name historians. I'm curious now. Jeffries is in none of them, either.