The Sky commentating for Bradley-Marquez was insane

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by TDT, May 14, 2015.


  1. RazorbackBoxing

    RazorbackBoxing Active Member Full Member

    564
    0
    Apr 15, 2015
    Agreed, no controversy here.
     
  2. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,111
    Jul 24, 2004
    Swagger pretty much is what swayed most into scoring for Bradley, because without a doubt, Marquez landed the cleaner, harder, more effective punches on the night.

    Fight was very competitive, Bradley took the first half of the fight and Marquez won the second half.
     
  3. TDT

    TDT New Member Full Member

    33
    17
    Nov 10, 2012
    Holy **** dude. Yeah. I thought Marquez rocked Bradley more often than vice versa, and it looked like he was landing more solid power punches. I don't remember a lot of really good clean hard power punches landing for Bradley.

    It was a close fight. I don't have a problem with the decision, but the commentators made it sound like Bradley was dominating and at times they sounded downright disrespectful and unprofessional in their cheer-leading for Bradley. And they kept going out of their way to mention that the crowd was biased and cheered whenever Marquez threw anything, but they give Marquez credit for like three of the punches he lands throughout the entire fight.
     
  4. ElCyclon

    ElCyclon Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,790
    14,479
    Dec 2, 2012
    Fight was close and could have gone either way but yes the commentators seemed biased(as always).
     
  5. TDT

    TDT New Member Full Member

    33
    17
    Nov 10, 2012
    Who's the guy who isn't Jim Watt? He's the worst. Literally the worst thing I have ever heard. He sounded like Tim Bradley's girlfriend but old and British and also a ****ing moron.