Joe Calzaghe retired 46-0 (32) in 2008. Get over it. Fans & haters; quit trolling!

No it doesn't.

1. That's the ref not the ring or location. The ref in the Kessler fights was fine so your point is void. Location would make no difference regarding Calzaghe vs Kessler.

2. Lol at slipping, he was hit a bunch of time, hurt and wobbling around. Ref may have stepped in a bit soon but it was not a slip ffs.

 

no foster gate though


maybe byron should have gone down the groves route appealing wonder if joe would have mand up to the rematch from boxing fans

 

If he wanted to appeal he could have. The first fight was good so I'm sure a rematch would have also been good. If Calzaghe was man enough to fight Byron the first time and fight the likes of Eubank, lacy, Kessler etc then I'm pretty sure Joe would have rematched him rather than give up his title.

 

joe did give up the wbc when carl was made mando he dropped it

why did he never give ried a rematch as he wanted one


lacy:rofl world class never proved it at the start of his career or since

and i dont give a fu cker what writer a b or c had him down as :bart

 

At the end of his career when he didn't need it anymore, similar to Froch giving up his title recently. When Joe fought Mitchell, I'm pretty sure he would rather rematch him than vacate, you can believe otherwise if you want.

Because he didn't want to or have to.

Who said Lacy was world class? I'm saying if Joe was man enough to fight Lacy and Mitchell then he would probably be man enough to fight Mtchell again if he was mandated to like Froch was vs Groves.

What's with the obsessive Joe hatred? Are you one of HerolGee's split personalities by any chance?

 

:|


weak you should no better if i had alts they would , should , if , probably be the best in the world

 

Funny, that's not what i've read:

First fight prediction:

http://ringtv.craveonline.com/news/182003-joe-calzaghe-****yzes-carl-froch-vs-george-groves

Second fight prediction:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/ot...aghe-concerned-by-Groves-lack-of-stamina.html

Joe predicted here almost to the letter what hapened in the rematch.

Just like he predicted what would happen to Carl if he faced Kessler.

Joe knows boxing.

 

If these drunkards don't see that it's embarrassing for someone with 40 professional fights to roll on the floor in tears of disbelief and yell "daddy! he doesn't hit hard!", "daddy look, I'm still here, I took those shots!!! daddy can you see me?" for beating someone with 21 professional fights then you know you're dealing with a bunch of desperate idiots.

 

he did not need it lol , but why keep the others

then pretty sure he would rematch to wait for it lol he did not want to or have to lofl

 

You guys are very similar...

 

Ironically, posts like this^ are more embarrassing than unifying world titles via utter schooling of a guy who certain posters on this site (scar maybe?) were fans of.

 

The hilarious thing is Scar was a huge fan. He was on the hype train big time.

edit:

First google result for 'scar BN24 lacy' :

 

I am pretty sure wassen stitiched that possibility up as soon as he noticed that Byron was actually still pretty good and not the totally faded fighter he was hoping to hire after getting destroyed by Antwun Echols.

Byron was keen to rematch, Calzaghe wanted none of it, he couldnt count on being saved by the ref twice.

 

If you don't think location has a minor effect on results, I cant continue that point with you, just agree to differ.

if you think the welsh ref didn't cheat by carrying cleverly back to corner after kovalev wrecked him, thenyou are blind.

he slipped sideways and fell, there was no punch anywhere near him when it happened.

it was cheating.

 

You finished a period with a period.....just sayin.