paulie gets them 90% right on the few times he gets it wrong you are quick to jump up and down.......big deal no one can get them all right
Just search on Google, Paulie Khan Mayweather. Malignaggi thinks Khan beats Pacquiao. Are you kidding me? Khan could barely beat feather-fisted Chris Algieri.
Since losing to Garcia, Khan has gone life and death with a washed up Julio Diaz, featherfisted Chris Algieri, has dominated a washed up Collazo, a lethargic Devon Alexander, mediocre Carlos Molina.... So 5 fights against handpicked opponents who were tailor made for him and he's looked anything but great. 2/5 he arguably lost, yet he deserves a shot at Mayweather as a result? Provo, Matthysse and Thurman would destroy this glass jawed hypejob. Let's see how good he looks against any of these guys, oh that's right A mere con man avoids punchers like the plague.
90% right, please! "Bradley all day!", "Porter is going to be a great fighter!", "True boxing fans want to see KhanvsFloyd, not Manny!". LOOOOL
pls get that 90% down a bit, quite a bit. you agree Pacquiao was greatest of of all time after he beat Cotto? this is what your boy paulie said you agree Pac was never that good, overhyped, has no angles like everyone says? thats' paulie you believe Khan >>>>> Floyd and Pac? that's paulie again, he's volatile. He is actually very good when he's on the broadcast booth cause he's restrained, cannot say stupid stuff during a major network broadcast. This is sane, calm paulie. Now watch his youtube interviews and off broadcast discussions and he can sound like a man that doesn't have a clue about anything. He's emotional and a bit crazy, when his eyes start wandering like a madman, he starts spewing absolute nonsense.