Miguel Cotto or Kovalev - who impressed you more

What is more impressive: a former 130-pounder Miguel Cotto destroying a legitimate middleweight in Daniel Geale or Sirgay Kovalev beating a 49-year-old Bernard Hopkins by unanimous decision?

Let your voices be heard!

 

I pity the fools who voted for Cotto. Y'all really don't know squat about boxing.

 

What are you babbling on about? Are you on your period or something?

 

OP, you're an embarrassment.

 

I only just realised that, Sirgay honestly?

Too many 9 year olds running amok on this website.

 

Did you just use "Lol" in a sentence? atsch

I like how you 'conveniently' ignore the fact that Hopkins was 49 years old at the time and almost everyone expected him to get KOed.

Keep drinking the Kovalev koolaid :good

 

It was an honest mistake. Could happen to anyone. Keep blowing it out of proportion though

English, mother****er, do you speak it?

 

Glass chin Kovalev couldn't even stop old man Hopkins

Whats impressive about that? Beterbiyev would KO them both on the same night

 

:thumbsup I couldn't have said it better myself.

 

That's not what I was referring to. I should really stop arguing with someone who doesn't know the difference between 'there' and 'their'

 

He is not 9. He is technically an adult. Which only makes this more sad.

 

120-107 Kovalev over Hopkins, without question every day of the week and not even debatable.

 

I already told you - that was an honest mistake. Just like your typos (that's why I brought them up).

You know that saying about people in glass houses, right? :hi:

 

They shouldn't walk around their house naked?

ala Benjamin Franklin famously used to in his downtown Philly house because he thought the sun was great for you with no limitations or drawbacks to the rule. And because he was a wild cat. Was famous for orgies and partying and was a god to the women of France during his stay there.

You just learned more about Ben Franklin on this forum than you will about boxing.

 

OP you're a loser atsch