Floyd Mayweather Jr. .Vs. Meldrick Taylor

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by la-califa, May 5, 2008.


  1. la-califa

    la-califa Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,292
    56
    Jun 12, 2007
    In a battle of speed versus speed, who would come out on top in this one?
     
  2. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    101
    Dec 26, 2007
    Pretty much 50/50 at 140. Floyd is the better outboxer, has the better defense, and is the more accurate puncher. However, Meldrick has the greater handspeed, workrate, and the ability to keep up with Floyd. In order for Floyd to get in his cleaner shots, he'll have to take some in return, and it's extremely hard to counter someone who throws 8 punch combos in a split second. It's also hard to pick them off from the outside, as was shown in Taylor's fight with Buddy McGirt, who looked to possibly be a bad matchup for him for that reason. Floyd's more tight and reserved defensively than McGirt though, so he'd likely not be getting hit as clean as often, but he'd still be getting outworked. His best chance would be to stay on the move and try to pick him off though, land the cleaner blows, see how the judges determine it.
     
  3. TreBen

    TreBen MeldrickHOF'09 Full Member

    16
    0
    Oct 9, 2007
    Floyd would land one precision shot at a time, while Meldrick would launch 5 and 6 punch volleys. I like Meldrick to outwork Floyd in an entertaining scrap that goes the full 12. Neither of these guys were (are) at their best at 147. It would be a great fight at any weight, but at 140 it would be BLAZING.
     
  4. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    242
    Sep 28, 2007
    Meldrick Taylor would make PBF look slow.
    I'd take A prime Meldrick by UD. (@ 140)
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    275
    Jul 22, 2004
    FLoyd's better footwork, defense pay dividends scoring the better punches, making Meldrick miss and making him pay. Meldrick would win a few rounds, maybe 4, but speed alone isnt enough to beat Mayweather.
     
  6. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    75
    Nov 20, 2006
    Assuming this is absolute peak Taylor, I reckon he may well edge a close fought decision.
     
  7. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    56
    Oct 15, 2007
  8. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,474
    Jan 6, 2007
    Floyd wins a disputed decision.....then Lou Duva takes a swipe at
    Uncle Roger, who proceeds to dump Duva on his butt.

    Then everybody gets fined.
     
  9. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    279
    Oct 4, 2005
    Yeah it's very likely to be a disputed decision, with two camps: one that favores aggression and volume punching, the other favoring defence and accurate single shots. A bit like Calzaghe vs Hopkins (though that was a clear decision in my book), but without all the clinching and less slapping.
     
  10. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,056
    Oct 25, 2006
    I like this post. I was going to pick Floyd, but you have given me suffiecient reasons to reconsider my choice.
     
  11. pugilistspecialist

    pugilistspecialist Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,966
    8
    Jul 19, 2004
    I'd have to favor Floyd Mayweather.

    This would be one of the few times Mayweather has to face someone who is faster with his hands, and also Taylor has a higher work rate. What would negate this would be Floyd's more polished jab, and longer reach. Mayweather also had faster feet and footwork than Taylor and would command the "geography" of the fight more often.

    Because of Taylor's ability to throw 4-6 punches in bunches it would be a difficult task for Mayweather to stand and counter while infighting. Often times Taylor fought really square to his opponent and Mayweather would take advantage more than not. Mayweather is the more accurate puncher and Taylor the more flashier puncher. Mayweather will also have an edge in power.

    This would be a close fight but I see Mayweather's better defense, jab, and accurate punches shadding him a close descision.
     
  12. la-califa

    la-califa Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,292
    56
    Jun 12, 2007
    Did anyone see how uncomfortable Mayweather looked against Judah in the early rounds? He didn't like being beat to the punch by a faster or equally as fast opponent. Judah looked really good, but slowed way down in the mid rounds. Taylor would not and he would keep the pressure up the whole fight. I don't think Mayweather is uncomfortable fighting off of his backfoot. Taylor should get the nod in this one.
     
  13. Rattler

    Rattler Middle Aged Man Full Member

    3,925
    21
    Feb 9, 2005
    Mayweather's power at 140 is underrated - and Taylor is well known for wanting to disregard boxing to mix it up. Mayweather would play into that, and I like his slowly busting up Taylor, who will have his moments, but will still look less impressive than usual due to Mayweather's head and shoulder movement.

    There would be periodic skirmishes between the two, but Mayweather would determine the tempo and range of the fight - with Taylor coming close, but losing a close decision.

    Mayweather - UD (6-4-2)
     
  14. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    101
    Dec 26, 2007
    Let me get this straight. You're picking Floyd to bust Meldrick up in close?
     
  15. Rattler

    Rattler Middle Aged Man Full Member

    3,925
    21
    Feb 9, 2005
    To a certain degree, yes.

    I'm not looking for a Gatti-esqe beatdown here, but he'll trade more with Taylor than he normally would.

    Remember, we're not talking about the Mayweather who is cautious with breakable hands - but the Floyd who will let go when the opportunity presents itself.

    If you don't think Floyd can mess Taylor up a little, you don't appreciate his ability to pinpoint his punches - or put some thump in em'.