The "Brook never got a shot", argument

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ellerbe, Jun 28, 2015.


  1. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,951
    17,034
    Jul 25, 2014
    :good, for the record unlike most mayweather fans, I think it's despicable and terrible for the sport if mayweather fights berto or mayfield on ppv. i'm still a fan boy admittedly but i have some boundaries and I can criticize him.
     
  2. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,951
    17,034
    Jul 25, 2014
    Not spectacular but it's more than 2 times what he made against Porter. Either way, I do see why Brook took the much more easy route instead of taking a short cut that would have clearly boosted his resume.
     
  3. RODNEY MORASH

    RODNEY MORASH C♯ Sharp or B♭ Flat Full Member

    1,154
    0
    Mar 17, 2012
  4. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,951
    17,034
    Jul 25, 2014
    hahaha love this post
     
  5. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    :clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:
     
  6. StreetsOfGold

    StreetsOfGold Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,252
    1
    Nov 9, 2008
    Only deluded casual fan northerners think that.

    Brook is a hype job he's fought 34 bums and shawn porter.

    They were still treating him like a prospect at 27 :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  7. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,951
    17,034
    Jul 25, 2014
    preach! :deal
     
  8. Bensub

    Bensub Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,527
    1,051
    Jan 17, 2015
    Well let's be honest i would say brook has now been managed well, Hearn didn't have him from the start but has got him the right fights now, I know the last two were below standard but not brooks fault, going the states to face porter and winning shows he will fight anyone and now brook v Bradley I know who I would pick to win, if Bradley gets wobbled by Vargas wouldn't take brooks right hand.
     
  9. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,951
    17,034
    Jul 25, 2014
    Hearn hasnt DONE **** for Brook, I despite hearn far more than Brook because contrary to what people believe I think Brook is a legit talent. Brook earned that IBF shot, and would have gotten it without Hearn, it's not like Hearn got him that title. Hearn has booked him against Dan and Gavin though which is just pathetic. And I agree Brook beats Bradley right now, Bradley was a different animal in 2012.
     
  10. glovesofcrimson

    glovesofcrimson Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,018
    7
    Sep 14, 2013
    :lol:
     
  11. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,951
    17,034
    Jul 25, 2014
    I love the anti-brook support I'm getting lmao, I swear it's usually me against 20 brit****s.
     
  12. theword

    theword Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,669
    7
    Aug 3, 2009
    Besides being 2x more than what Brook made vs Porter, it was also the initial offer (or at least that's what the article implies).

    In negotiations TR would have started low (500k) Hearn would have put forward a counter offer (significantly higher than 500k) and they would have gone back and forth etc.

    I doubt the final agreed some would be the first offer TR put on the table.
     
  13. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,951
    17,034
    Jul 25, 2014
    :good didnt even realize that.
     
  14. critix

    critix Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,619
    493
    Jul 9, 2012
    greatest post i have read on kell brook on this forum.....well done :good:deal
     
  15. Liquid Fire

    Liquid Fire Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,246
    1,160
    Oct 29, 2016
    :risas3: