Is Andre Berto a worthwhile opponent for Floyd Mayweater Jr?

I agree with you, which is why I'm not up in arms, but it's still a cherry pick IMO. But I've always maintained that after the Pac fight, I really don't care who he fights.

 

Khan, Thurman, Brook? Why not these fights..... Khan is practically begging to fight Mayweather, but he takes this instead. Floyd is a disgrace.

 

That's ignorant. Broner and Beiber are fake and idiots.

 

The fact they are thinking of putting this on free tv says it all

 

If he'd lost or drawn with PAC and was waiting on a rematch....

Otherwise...Not even Algeri is this bad.

 

Sadly, I think this is to hold him over for a Pac rematch in 2016.

 

Like the majority of Floyd's opponents, he has weak defense. If a fighter like Maidana who used to be one dimensional, by using ALITTLE defense made a rapid fire Floyd miss, what would Kell Brook do? Brook is the only ww worthy of fighting Mayweather, anyone else nobody wants to see or has any interest in.

 

Guerrero and Ortiz were, I think Maidana was a perceived cherry pick.

 

Broner, Porter, Khan, Chavez, Brook, Bradley, Thurman, Algieri, Sadam, Vargas, Alexander....

All may not be worthwhile, but they all rank higher than Berto. It's as if Mayweather went online and tried to find the last ranked welterweight.

 

Coming from the guy who wouldn't shut up about Algieri's lumpy jab as soon as the farce with Pacquiao was signed.

You are a stain on this forum and the sooner you decide to order that noose you've got reserved on amazon, the better.

 

Totally acceptable. Floyd just schooled the so called fighter of the Decade and the guy who was supposed to be his ultimate challenge to prove who was the best fighter of this era. There's no one left at 147 down who is better than the guys he's already beaten. he's already proven himself to be the best of this era beyond a shadow of the doubt. At almost 40 years old, and well past his prime, its ok for him to go out with a couple of easy fights.