Kell Brook or Deontay Wilder?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Brixton Bomber, Aug 21, 2015.


  1. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,102
    Sep 21, 2013
    Who is the bigger fraud out of the two?
     
  2. miniq

    miniq AJ IS A BODYBUILDING BUM Full Member

    47,444
    27,204
    Oct 23, 2011
    I'm fairly certain Brook will step up his opposition soon & it's unlikely he will be KO'd unless it's Thurman or Maidana

    Wilder on the otherhand...
     
  3. sniffmybadger

    sniffmybadger Relationships are not my forte Full Member

    9,296
    9,006
    Jan 20, 2010
    Brook at least has Porter. Wilder has......
     
  4. theanatolian

    theanatolian Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,624
    5,945
    May 2, 2015
    I don't think either is fraud but Brook's win over Porter>Wilder's win over Stiverne
     
  5. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,102
    Sep 21, 2013
    Stiverne was the WBC champ.

    He's a better name than Porter.
     
  6. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    They're about equal but I'd rate Brook higher... Don't mean to be a British hating troll but it is what it is [emoji38]
     
  7. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    100%. Brook was protected for a long time, but at least seems to be trying to make some big fights lately.
     
  8. TinFoilHat

    TinFoilHat Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,740
    403
    Sep 29, 2013
    Porter was the IBF champ? is there that much of a difference?... WW is a much stronger division than HW... Also didn't stiverne have severe dehydration? It's obvious something was fishy about Stivernes performance that night...

    Anyone who says that Wilder > Brook must be in bed with Haymon...
     
  9. TinFoilHat

    TinFoilHat Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,740
    403
    Sep 29, 2013
    Look at your username... :rofl

    Like I said if you rate Brook worse than Wilder, YOU HAVE AN AGENDA. Your agenda is probably to promote that hypejob Amir KHAN. Seeing as his name is in your username... Lol not even trying to hide it.
     
  10. caligula4

    caligula4 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,764
    886
    Jul 13, 2011
    Everyone with any sense or knowledge of boxing knows that Brook has the more impressive resume. That does not mean the future will go well. I am just stating the absolute obvious. I also have no faith in WIlder, mind ;)
     
  11. Lady Girl

    Lady Girl Kneel Before Zod! Full Member

    31,836
    2,058
    Nov 2, 2013
    brook is a more complete fighter
     
  12. BagsWithDust

    BagsWithDust Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,734
    1
    Dec 18, 2009
    Hard to say, both guys fought a pretty good name to earn the belt, but neither have fought better opp since then. I would go with Deontay though...
     
  13. Godlovkin

    Godlovkin Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,656
    3
    Feb 5, 2015
    Stiverne's not a good name

    The guy was a cherrypick gone wrong for the WBC when they tried to make tits Arreola a champ after Vitali vacated his belt

    Porter is a better win than Stiverne, Porter actually beat a legit beltholder
     
  14. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,800
    2,991
    Apr 16, 2005
    Wilder and it's not close. At least Brook has fought several decent fighters. Wilder? The only live body he's got on his ledger is the limited Bermane Stiverne, which says it all
     
  15. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    72,699
    38,950
    Sep 29, 2012
    Wilder without a doubt... Porter triumphs anyone on Wilder resume by far.